WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: The reasons why teens are not immunized are related to parental lack of knowledge and the need for provider recommendations. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS:The reasons for vaccine refusal for human papillomavirus vaccine differ from other teen vaccines, and concerns about its safety are increasing over time.abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine the reasons adolescents are not vaccinated for specific vaccines and how these reasons have changed over time. METHODS:We analyzed the 2008-2010 National Immunization Survey of Teens examining reasons parents do not have their teens immunized. Parents whose teens were not up to date (Not-UTD) for Tdap/Td and MCV4 were asked the main reason they were not vaccinated. Parents of female teens Not-UTD for human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV) were asked their intent to give HPV, and those unlikely to get HPV were asked the main reason why not. RESULTS:The most frequent reasons for not vaccinating were the same for Tdap/Td and MCV4, including "Not recommended" and "Not needed or not necessary." For HPV, the most frequent reasons included those for the other vaccines as well as 4 others, including "Not sexually active" and "Safety concerns/Side effects." "Safety concerns/Side effects" increased from 4.5% in 2008 to 7.7% in 2009 to 16.4% in 2010 and, in 2010, approaching the most common reason "Not Needed or Not Necessary" at 17.4% (95% CI: 15.7-19.1). Although parents report that health care professionals increasingly recommend all vaccines, including HPV, the intent to not vaccinate for HPV increased from 39.8% in 2008 to 43.9% in 2010 (OR for trend 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.13).CONCLUSIONS: Despite doctors increasingly recommending adolescent vaccines, parents increasingly intend not to vaccinate female teens with HPV. The concern about safety of HPV grew with each year. Addressing specific and growing parental concerns about HPV will require different considerations than those for the other vaccines. Dr Darden conceptualized and designed the study, participated in the analyses, drafted the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr Thompson helped with the design of the study, designed the analytic plan, oversaw the analyses, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Mrs Hale carried out the analyses, interpreted results, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr Roberts helped with the design of the study, interpreted results, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr Naifeh interpreted results, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr Pope helped with the design of the study, interpreted results, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr Jacobson helped with the design of the study, interpreted results, reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.(Continued on last page) PEDIA...

While patients and providers are receptive to LDCT screening, efforts are needed to improve guideline knowledge and adherence among providers. System-level interventions are necessary to facilitate time and resources for shared decision making and smoking cessation counseling and treatment. Further research is needed to identify optimal strategies for effective lung cancer screening in the community.

Objective: In spite of the high prevalence of obesity in the Latino population, there is limited recent information that can be used by health-care providers to develop culturally appropriate weight loss strategies for this population. Therefore, we describe weight loss experiences, attitudes and barriers in overweight Latino adults. Design: Qualitative study using focus group methodology Subjects: Twenty-one overweight adults (body mass index X25, age X20 years) self-identified as Latinos. Methods: Subjects participated in one of three focus groups. Reccurring themes within group discussions were identified by three independent investigators, one who was ethnicity concordant. Results: Themes included the presence of mixed messages when determining one's appropriate weight, with participants' desire to lose weight to be healthy (based on professional advice and personal experience) conflicting with the cultural idea that being overweight is healthy. Participants described discordance when adapting to the mainstream, leading to the loss of healthy traditional habits. Participants expressed interest in weight loss and familiarity with dieting and weight loss interventions. They desired culturally appropriate nutrition education and reassurance regarding healthy dieting from health-care providers. The importance of interactions with peers during education was another relevant theme, and participants were overwhelmingly positive about group education. Conclusions: To improve health promotion for Latinos, cultural factors distinctive to this underserved population, and barriers they articulate, should be considered when developing weight loss interventions.

No abstract