No abstract

In this reply, Charles Strozier raises objections to the review by Karen Maroda (2002) of his biography of Heinz Kohut. He questions Maroda's fairness in consulting with several people—especially Robert Stolorow—bound to raise critical (and biased) objections to the biography without also talking to more objective observers. Stozier also notes how profoundly Maroda misunderstands his characterization of Kohut's sexuality in the biography.

No abstract