Objectives: We performed a descriptive analysis of patient and treatment characteristics in premature discharges “against medical advice” (AMA) in a cohort of patients with opioid-related hospitalizations. Methods: We abstracted data from 1152 opioid related hospitalizations of 928 adult patients in a large academic health system. Using electronic health record data, hospitalizations were categorized as AMA or conventional discharge (CD). To determine differences between AMA and CD regarding treatment characteristics, Fisher exact test, t tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression were performed. Results: 74 / 1152 (6%) of opioid-related hospitalizations were discharged AMA. Hospitalizations that resulted in AMA discharge had shorter median length of stay (AMA vs CD 3.5 vs 5.5 days, P < 0.001) and received fewer of any type of opioid agonist treatment (AMA vs CD 73% vs 84%, P = 0.03). Although the number of hospitalizations in which methadone was administered did not differ between the AMA and CD groups, hospitalizations that resulted in AMA had more dose reductions and lesser quantities of methadone overall before discharge. Buprenorphine use was low overall in AMA and CD (0% and 2.1%, respectively) Conclusion: In this sample of opioid related hospitalizations, admissions that resulted in AMA discharge had fewer opioid agonist administrations and lower methadone dosing. These findings support efforts to initiate opioid agonist therapy during hospital admissions, and further studies should determine whether this practice mitigates AMA discharges.

Background: New Orleans, Louisiana served as a central location for a surge of novel coronavirus cases during the months of March 2020 to May 2020. To provide guidance to palliative care teams naive to the palliative care demand associated with a surge of coronavirus cases, we document our protocol to best optimize palliative care resources. This report aims to present this information and reflect upon what was most beneficial/least beneficial to serve as a roadmap for palliative teams facing this pandemic. Objective: To pilot a team-based structured protocol to categorize severity of COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and subsequently collaborate with the palliative interdisciplinary team to assess physical, spiritual, and psychosocial needs. Design: New ICU consults were categorized into color-coded clinical severity ''pots'' during daily ICU interdisciplinary rounds. Clinical decision making and communication with patient/next of kin were based on ''pot'' classification. Settings/Subjects: Palliative medicine consults were placed on all COVID-19 positive patients admitted to the ICU between March 29, 2020, and May 1, 2020. Measurements: A retrospective chart review was performed to analyze the effect of palliative care consultation on completion of goals-of-care conversations and the life-sustaining treatment (LST) document, an advance directive form specific to the Veterans Affairs hospital system between March 29, 2020 and May 1, 2020. Results: Of the palliative consults evaluated by a palliative provider, 74% resulted in completion of a LST document, 58% resulted in video contact with family members, and 100% incorporated a goals-of-care discussion. Conclusions: We found that standardizing palliative care consultation on all COVID-19 positive ICU admissions subjectively alleviated the burden on ICU providers and staff in the midst of a crisis, resulted in increased documentation of patient goals-of-care preferences/LSTs, facilitated clinical updates to family members, and better distributed clinical burden among palliative team members.

No abstract