Background Options for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease progresses after first-line chemotherapy are limited. This randomized, open-label, international phase 3 study evaluated efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus docetaxel in this patient population after failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Methods Patients were randomized to nivolumab 3 mg per kilogram every 2 weeks or docetaxel 75 mg per square meter every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results Nivolumab improved overall survival versus docetaxel. Median overall survival was 12.2 months (95% CI, 9.7 to 15.0) for nivolumab (n=292) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 10.7) for docetaxel (n=290) (hazard ratio, 0.73; 96% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; P=0.002). One-year overall survival rates were 51% (95% CI, 45 to 56) for nivolumab and 39% (95% CI, 33 to 45) for docetaxel. Updated efficacy results with additional follow up are available for overall survival only: 18-month overall survival rates were 39% (95% CI, 34 to 45) for nivolumab and 23% (95% CI, 19 to 28) for docetaxel. Response rates were 19% for nivolumab and 12% for docetaxel (P=0.02). Although progression-free survival did not favor nivolumab (2.3 months for nivolumab versus 4.2 months for docetaxel), 1-year progression-free survival was higher for nivolumab (19%) than docetaxel (8%). Nivolumab further improved efficacy across all endpoints at predefined ≥1%, ≥5%, and ≥10% programmed death-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor membrane expression levels. Grade 3–5 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 10% of nivolumab and 54% of docetaxel-treated patients. Conclusions Compared to docetaxel, nivolumab demonstrated superior overall survival, with PD-L1 expression conferring enhanced efficacy in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. The safety profile of nivolumab was favorable versus docetaxel.

Competing Interests Statement RMS, TAC and LGTM are inventors on a provisional patent application (62/569,053) filed by MSK, relating to the use of TMB in cancer immunotherapy.MDH, NAR and TAC are inventors on a PCT patent application (PCT/US2015/062208) filed by MSK, relating to the use of TMB in lung cancer immunotherapy.MSK and the inventors may receive a share of commercialization revenue from license agreements relating to these patent applications. CHL received research funding from Eisai, BMS, Exelixis, Pfizer, Calithera and consulting fees from Exelixis and Eisai. ANS has received research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Astra-Zeneca, Xcovery and serves on the advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Castle Biosciences; he also receives royalties from UpToDate. MDH receives research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb; is paid consultant to Merck

IMPORTANCE Targeting oncogenic drivers (genomic alterations critical to cancer development and maintenance) has transformed the care of patients with lung adenocarcinomas. The Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium was formed to perform multiplexed assays testing adenocarcinomas of the lung for drivers in 10 genes to enable clinicians to select targeted treatments and enroll patients into clinical trials. OBJECTIVES To determine the frequency of oncogenic drivers in patients with lung adenocarcinomas and to use the data to select treatments targeting the identified driver(s) and measure survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From 2009 through 2012, 14 sites in the United States enrolled patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinomas and a performance status of 0 through 2 and tested their tumors for 10 drivers. Information was collected on patients, therapies, and survival. INTERVENTIONS Tumors were tested for 10 oncogenic drivers, and results were used to select matched targeted therapies. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Determination of the frequency of oncogenic drivers, the proportion of patients treated with genotype-directed therapy, and survival. RESULTS From 2009 through 2012, tumors from 1007 patients were tested for at least 1 gene and 733 for 10 genes (patients with full genotyping). An oncogenic driver was found in 466 of 733 patients (64%). Among these 733 tumors, 182 tumors (25%) had the KRAS driver; sensitizing EGFR, 122 (17%); ALK rearrangements, 57 (8%); other EGFR, 29 (4%); 2 or more genes, 24 (3%); ERBB2 (formerly HER2), 19 (3%); BRAF, 16 (2%); PIK3CA, 6 (<1%); MET amplification, 5 (<1%); NRAS, 5 (<1%); MEK1, 1 (<1%); AKT1, 0. Results were used to select a targeted therapy or trial in 275 of 1007 patients (28%). The median survival was 3.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.96-7.70) for the 260 patients with an oncogenic driver and genotype-directed therapy compared with 2.4 years (IQR, 0.88-6.20) for the 318 patients with any oncogenic driver(s) who did not receive genotype-directed therapy (propensity score–adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53-0.9], P = .006). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Actionable drivers were detected in 64% of lung adenocarcinomas. Multiplexed testing aided physicians in selecting therapies. Although individuals with drivers receiving a matched targeted agent lived longer, randomized trials are required to determine if targeting therapy based on oncogenic drivers improves survival.

Purpose Treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is characterized by durable responses and improved survival in a subset of patients. Clinically available tools to optimize use of ICIs and understand the molecular determinants of response are needed. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly routine, but its role in identifying predictors of response to ICIs is not known. Methods Detailed clinical annotation and response data were collected for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with anti-programmed death-1 or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1] therapy and profiled by targeted NGS (MSK-IMPACT; n = 240). Efficacy was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, and durable clinical benefit (DCB) was defined as partial response/stable disease that lasted > 6 months. Tumor mutation burden (TMB), fraction of copy number-altered genome, and gene alterations were compared among patients with DCB and no durable benefit (NDB). Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed for 49 patients to compare quantification of TMB by targeted NGS versus WES. Results Estimates of TMB by targeted NGS correlated well with WES (ρ = 0.86; P < .001). TMB was greater in patients with DCB than with NDB ( P = .006). DCB was more common, and progression-free survival was longer in patients at increasing thresholds above versus below the 50th percentile of TMB (38.6% v 25.1%; P < .001; hazard ratio, 1.38; P = .024). The fraction of copy number-altered genome was highest in those with NDB. Variants in EGFR and STK11 associated with a lack of benefit. TMB and PD-L1 expression were independent variables, and a composite of TMB plus PD-L1 further enriched for benefit to ICIs. Conclusion Targeted NGS accurately estimates TMB and elevated TMB further improved likelihood of benefit to ICIs. TMB did not correlate with PD-L1 expression; both variables had similar predictive capacity. The incorporation of both TMB and PD-L1 expression into multivariable predictive models should result in greater predictive power.