In this brief communication, the authors develop the argument that science by pressrelease and by press conference without the readily available study for scrutiny is outside of the ethos of thescientific enterprise. Additionally, we argue why and how science by press conference and by press release is arecipe for misinformation and poor choices in public health decision-making. Finally, the authors dive into the implications of this emerging phenomenon for publichealth in Brazil in the COVID19 era.
Herein, we investigated whether daily steps can discriminate between older adults with unhealthy and healthy joint profiles of sedentary time (ST) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Apparently healthy community-dwelling older adults aged 60–80 years were included in this cross-sectional analysis (n = 258). Daily steps, ST, and MVPA were assessed by accelerometry. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to test the performance of daily steps in identifying older adults with unhealthy (high ST/low MVPA) and healthy (low ST/high MVPA) joint profiles of ST/MVPA. The cardiovascular disease risk of unhealthy/healthy profiles was compared using a continuous metabolic syndrome score (cMetS). Daily steps discriminated older adults with unhealthy (AUC 0.892, 0.850–0.934; cut-off: ≤5,263 steps/day; sensitivity/specificity: 82.5%/81%) and healthy (AUC 0.803, 0.738–0.868; cut-off: ≥7,134 steps/day; sensitivity/specificity: 79.5%/66.2%) joint profiles of ST/MVPA. The unhealthy profile showed a higher cMetS (β = 0.46; p = 0.008). Likewise, older adults who fell below the daily steps cut-off point to identify the unhealthy profile of ST/MVPA exhibited a higher cMetS (β = 0.34; p = 0.004). In summary, our results provide a starting point for considering daily steps as a single heuristic metric for identifying older adults with a joint profile of high ST/low MVPA, which makes them more susceptible to CVD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.