Background: There is increasing evidence that, in addition to the well-known effects on musculoskeletal health, vitamin D status may be related to a number of non-skeletal diseases.An international expert panel formulated recommendations on vitamin D for clinical practice, taking into consideration the best evidence available based on published literature today. In addition, where data were limited to smaller clinical trials or epidemiologic studies, the panel made expert-opinion based recommendations.Methods: Twenty-five experts from various disciplines (classical clinical applications, cardiology, autoimmunity, and cancer) established draft recommendations during a 2-day meeting. Thereafter, representatives of all disciplines refined the recommendations and related texts, subsequently reviewed by all panelists. For all recommendations, panelists expressed the extent of agreement using a 5-point scale. Results and conclusion:Recommendations were restricted to clinical practice and concern adult patients with or at risk for fractures, falls, cardiovascular or autoimmune diseases, and

Many new findings on the organization of saccades and pursuit eye movements at the cortical level have recently been reported. Furthermore, eye movements are increasingly used as a tool to elucidate relatively complex neuropsychological processes such as attention, spatial memory, motivation and decisional processes, and a considerable number of reports dealing with these questions have been observed.

Three patients with a unilateral cortical lesion affecting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), i.e. Brodmann area 46, were tested using different paradigms of reflexive saccades (gap and overlap tasks), intentional saccades (antisaccades, memory-guided and predictive saccades) and smooth pursuit movements. Visually guided saccades with gap and overlap, latency of correct antisaccades and memory-guided saccades and the gain of smooth pursuit were normal, compared with controls. These results confirm our anatomical data showing that the adjacent frontal eye field (FEF) was unimpaired in these patients. The specific pattern of abnormalities after a unilateral DLPFC lesion, compared with that of the FEF lesions previously reported, consists mainly of: (i) a bilateral increase in the percentage of errors in the antisaccade task (misdirected reflexive saccades); (ii) a bilateral increase in the variable error in amplitude, without significant decrease in the gain, in the memory-guided saccade task; and (iii) a bilateral decrease in the percentage of anticipatory saccades in the predictive task. Taken together, these results suggest that the DLPFC plays a crucial role in the decisional processes, preparing saccades by inhibiting unwanted reflexive saccades (inhibition), maintaining memorized information for ongoing intentional saccades (short-term spatial memory) or facilitating anticipatory saccades (prediction), depending upon current external environmental and internal circumstances.

Eye movements were recorded in 14 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in the "off" condition, 14 patients with striatonigral degeneration (SND), 10 patients with corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and 10 patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), with comparison with 12 control subjects. Vertical saccade paralysis was not observed in the PD, SND, and CBD groups but was present in 9 patients of 10 in the PSP group. In the PD and SND groups, horizontal reflexive visually guided saccade latency and accuracy were similar, and differed only slightly from those of controls. In the CBD group, saccade latency was significantly increased and correlated to an "apraxia score"; whereas, in the PSP group, saccade amplitude was significantly decreased. Thus, the abnormalities of both horizontal saccade parameters in the PSP group contrasted with those observed in the CBD group. The percentage of errors in the antisaccade task, an index of prefrontal dysfunction, was markedly increased only in the PSP group. The smooth pursuit gain was decreased in all groups but more severely in the PSP group. It may be concluded that saccade abnormalities are clearly different in SND, CBD, and PSP, and might help in early differential diagnosis in individual patients, but that SND cannot be differentiated from PD on the simple basis of eye movement abnormalities.

Saccadic eye movements are controlled by a cortical network composed of several oculomotor areas that are now accurately localized. Clinical and experimental studies have enabled us to understand their specific roles better. These areas are: (1) the parietal eye field (PEF) located in the intraparietal sulcus involved in visuospatial integration and in reflexive saccade triggering; (2) the frontal eye field (FEF), located in the precentral gyrus, involved in the preparation and the triggering of purposive saccades; and (3) the supplementary eye field (SEF) on the medial wall of the frontal lobe, probably involved in the temporal control of sequences of visually guided saccades and in eye-hand coordination. A putative cingulate eye field (CEF), located in the anterior cingulate cortex, would be involved in motivational modulation of voluntary saccades. Besides these motor areas, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) in the midfrontal gyrus is involved in reflexive saccade inhibition and visual short-term memory.