This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

For patients with a greater than 12-month history of heel pain, EPAT can effectively decrease plantar fascia thickness as demonstrated objectively by ultrasound evaluation and reduce patient-reported pain. No relationship between length of followup and change in plantar fascia thickness was found after 12 months.

Patients with prostate cancer substantially perceived their HRQOL to be better, compared to patients with other cancers, with overall health, energy, and mental health below of Hong Kong general population. Interventions should target at these domains in order to improve the HRQOL of patients with prostate cancer. It is reassuring to find that prostate cancer had less negative impact on HRQOL than other cancer types did.

Computed tomography (CT) is an important diagnostic tool in the evaluation of trauma patients. Accurate interpretation of CT scans remains critical in decision-making and the resultant quality of care. In our study, the records of a consecutive cohort of trauma patients who underwent after-hour CT scans of the head and abdomen between January 23 and June 30, 2004, at Kern Medical Center were reviewed. Three hundred thirty-five CT studies were collected in 211 patients. The accuracy of resident interpretation was 92.8 per cent for abdominal and 97.5 per cent for head CT. Resident readings were 93.2 per cent sensitive and 95.4 per cent specific with a positive predictive value of 85.2 per cent and a negative predictive value of 98.0 per cent. There were 16 (4.8%) instances of interpretation discrepancy between the surgical resident and attending radiologist. Most differences occurred in the evaluation of abdominal CT. In no instance was management or outcome for these patients affected. This data demonstrates a low error rate in resident interpretation of after-hour CT scans of the head and abdomen in trauma, but there remains a need for the continued review of the quality of surgical resident radiologic interpretation in situations when an attending radiologist is not immediately available.