PurposeThis article's purpose is to examine the case for the use of the theatre arts in the evaluation of UK City of Culture (UKCC) programmes, specifically headphone verbatim.Design/methodology/approachThrough an analysis of secondary evidence, supported by some primary research, this article analyses past and present evaluation practices surrounding UKCC programmes and the case for headphone verbatim to be included as a method of gathering and distributing research data. The article also observes the challenges in how data may be disseminated through verbatim theatre performance practices, given the limited examples of its use in this context.FindingsThe author argues that the theatre arts can provide a different way of knowing and understanding the impacts of UKCC projects on the host city. Specifically, that headphone verbatim can bring an experiential perspective that is rarely if ever captured by existing UKCC evaluation methods and policymaking in general.Originality/valueThis article details an innovative method of evaluating social impacts associated with UKCC projects.

This report describes the procedure for horizontal directional drilling (HDD) and the benefits of pulling a pipeline through a borehole as opposed to digging a trench and lowering the pipe into it. A case study is mentioned where water department officials in Normal, Illinois, used HDD during the installation of 4,100 ft of new water main. The Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association (DIPRA), is highlighted in the article.