ObjectiveFunctional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) of neonates with perinatal brain injury could improve prediction of motor impairment before symptoms manifest, and establish how early brain organization relates to subsequent development. This cohort study is the first to describe and quantitatively assess functional brain networks and their relation to later motor skills in neonates with a diverse range of perinatal brain injuries.MethodsInfants (n = 65, included in final analyses: n = 53) were recruited from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and were stratified based on their age at birth (premature vs. term), and on whether neuropathology was diagnosed from structural MRI. Functional brain networks and a measure of disruption to functional connectivity were obtained from 14 min of fcMRI acquired during natural sleep at term-equivalent age.ResultsDisruption to connectivity of the somatomotor and frontoparietal executive networks predicted motor impairment at 4 and 8 months. This disruption in functional connectivity was not found to be driven by differences between clinical groups, or by any of the specific measures we captured to describe the clinical course.ConclusionfcMRI was predictive over and above other clinical measures available at discharge from the NICU, including structural MRI. Motor learning was affected by disruption to somatomotor networks, but also frontoparietal executive networks, which supports the functional importance of these networks in early development. Disruption to these two networks might be best addressed by distinct intervention strategies.
Cortical resting state networks have been consistently identified in infants using resting state-functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Comparable studies in adults have demonstrated cerebellar components of well-established cerebral networks. However, there has been limited investigation of early cerebellar functional connectivity. We acquired non-sedated rs-fMRI data in the first week of life in 57 healthy, term-born infants and at term-equivalent postmenstrual age in 20 very preterm infants (mean birth gestational age 27 ± 2 weeks) without significant cerebral or cerebellar injury. Seed correlation analyses were performed using regions of interests spanning the cortical and subcortical gray matter and cerebellum. Parallel analyses were performed using rs-fMRI data acquired in 100 healthy adults. Our results demonstrate that cortico-cerebellar functional connectivity is well-established by term. Intra- and cortico-cerebellar functional connectivity were largely similar in infants and adults. However, infants showed more functional connectivity structure within the cerebellum, including stronger homotopic correlations and more robust anterior-posterior anticorrelations. Prematurity was associated with reduced correlation magnitudes, but no alterations in intra- and cortico-cerebellar functional connectivity topography. These results add to the growing evidence that the cerebellum plays an important role in shaping early brain development during infancy.
ObjectiveFunctional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) of neonates with perinatal brain injury could improve prediction of motor impairment before symptoms manifest, and establish how early brain organization relates to subsequent development. Methods: This cohort study is the first to describe and quantitatively assess functional brain networks and their relation to later motor skills in neonates with a diverse range of perinatal brain injuries. Infants (n=65, included in final analyses: n=53) were recruited from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and were stratified based on their age at birth (premature vs. term), and on whether neuropathology was diagnosed from structural MRI. Functional brain networks and a measure of disruption to functional connectivity were obtained from 14 minutes of fcMRI acquired during natural sleep at term-equivalent age.ResultsDisruption to connectivity of the somatomotor and frontoparietal executive networks predicted motor impairment at 4 and 8 months. This disruption in functional connectivity was not found to be driven by differences between clinical groups, or by any of the specific measures we captured to describe the clinical course.ConclusionfcMRI was predictive over and above other clinical measures available at discharge from the NICU, including structural MRI. Motor learning was affected by disruption to somatomotor networks, but also frontoparietal executive networks, which supports the functional importance of these networks in early development. Disruption to these two networks might be best addressed by distinct intervention strategies.
Aim: Head motion has a profound effect on MRI, and will contaminate comparisons of function or structure between groups that move differently. This work compares adults and infants. Infants might move differently for physical, physiological and cognitive reasons, but so far these differences have not been quantified. Methods:The spatial modes and total magnitude of motion in the MRI scanner were measured (N=211). The effects of group (infant vs. adult) and stimulation paradigm (auditory vs. visual) were evaluated. Results: Spatial modes of motion were found to be distinct between infant and adult groups. Infants had less anterior-posterior translational motion, but greater motion in other dimensions, often with complex multi-axis patterns. In magnitude distribution, sleeping infants often remained more still than adults, but when movement did occur it was more extreme and abrupt.Two groups of adults presented with different stimulation showed similar shapes of motion. Conclusion: The spatial modes and magnitude distribution of motion differed substantially between groups, and must be considered carefully as a confound in comparisons of structure or function. The abruptness and magnitude of movement suggests that for infants relative to adults post-processing strategies such as de-noising are likely to be more effective than prospective motion correction.. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under aThe copyright holder for this preprint (which was not . http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/114447 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online 3 Key notes• Quantified the spatial and temporal distribution of motion during MRI in 211 adults and neonates• The different spatial modes in adults and infants were visualized and statistically contrasted• The magnitude of motion had "heavier tails" in infants, with more still periods, and more large movements, than adults.. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under a The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not . http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/114447 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online 4 Participant motion is a serious problem in MRI of the head, affecting acquisitions that measure function, anatomy and connective tracts. For example, in functional connectivity MRI (fc-MRI), two brain regions are determined to be part of the same network if they show a similar pattern of fluctuation in activity over time. Noise introduced by motion can strengthen or weaken these correlations, and may have a structured spatial pattern: the motion-induced signal is often similar for regions that are close together and dissimilar for regions far apart, increasing the relative strength of short-rather than long-range connections [1,2]. As motion may also differ between groups under study (e.g., children are more likely to move than adults), great care must be taken in interpreting a difference between groups in any measure that is affected by motion [3].Motion is a ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.