HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) is a frequently occurring comorbidity of HIV infection. Evidence suggests this condition starts subclinical before a progression to a symptomatic stage. Blood oxygenated level dependent (BOLD) fMRI has shown to be a sensitive tool to detect abnormal brain function in an early stage and might therefore be useful to evaluate the effect of HIV infection on brain function. An extensive literature search was performed in June 2015. Eligibility criteria for included studies were as follows: (1) conducting with HIV-positive patients, (2) using BOLD fMRI, and (3) including a HIV-negative control group. A total of 19 studies were included in the review including 931 participants. Differences in activation between HIV-positive and -negative participants were found when testing multiple domains, i.e., attention, (working) memory, and especially executive functioning. Overall, HIV-positive patients showed hyperactivation in task-related brain regions despite equal performances as controls. Task performance was degraded only for the most complex tasks. A few studies investigated the effect of aging on fMRI, and most of them found no interaction with HIV infection. Only three studies evaluated the effect of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) on functional data suggesting an increase in activation with the use of cART. fMRI is a sensitive instrument to detect subtle cognitive changes in HIV patients. Open questions remain regarding the effects of cART on fMRI and the effects of aging on fMRI.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13365-016-0483-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: Efavirenz is well known for its clinical cognitive side effects. Even asymptomatic patients who switch for other reasons than neurocognitive complaints have reported a subjective improvement in cognitive functioning after discontinuing efavirenz. The aim of this study was to assess the effect on cognition of switching Atripla (TDF/FTC/EFV) to Eviplera (TDF/FTC/RPV), hypothesizing an improvement when discontinuing efavirenz. Setting: A randomized controlled design with a highly comparable comparator drug was used to minimize bias and to differentiate drug versus learning effects. An extensive sensitive neuropsychological assessment (NPA) was used to detect subtle changes. Methods: Virologically suppressed, cognitively asymptomatic male HIV-infected patients on Atripla were included and randomized (2:1) to switch to Eviplera (switch group) or continue on Atripla (control group) for 12 weeks. At baseline and week 12, patients underwent an extensive NPA. Results: Fourteen control and 34 switch subjects completed the study. There were no differences at baseline. Group analysis demonstrated a significantly better improvement for the switch group on the domains attention (P = 0.041) and speed of information processing (P = 0.014). Normative comparison analyses showed that 5 of the 34 patients who switched (15%) improved on NPA score as compared to the control group. Interestingly, subjective improvement after discontinuing efavirenz made 74% of the switch group chose for a regime without efavirenz after study completion. Conclusions: Switching from Atripla to Eviplera resulted in objective cognitive improvement on the group level in cognitively asymptomatic patients. Discrepancies in objective and subjective cognitive complaints make it challenging to identify patients who would benefit from discontinuing efavirenz.

The MoCA-B appeared not to be a valid screening tool for HAND in this setting. The prevalence of HAND in this setting is high, but appeared overestimated when using published norms.