No abstract

No abstract

Purpose: High-definition cone-beam computed tomography (HD-CBCT) offers superior image quality at the cost of higher radiation dose compared to lowdose CBCT (LD-CBCT). The aim of this study was to investigate whether peri-implant bone lesions can be accurately quantified using LD-CBCT, even when including the influence of surrounding tissues. Methods: Twelve titanium implants restored with all-ceramic crowns were placed in bovine bone, and peri-implant lesions were prepared. Radiographic imaging was performed using IR (intraoral radiography), HD-CBCT and LD-CBCT. To simulate the in-vivo situation, the samples were placed inside a dry human mandible, and a second LD-CBCT imaging was performed (LD-CBCT*). The datasets were presented to four observers in random order. Maximum lesion depth and width were measured in a standardized mesiodistal slice in IR, HD-CBCT, LD-CBCT, and LD-CBCT*. Mean lesion depth and width measurements for each sample in HD-CBCT served as reference. Results: Interrater agreement was slight for depth and excellent for width in HD-CBCT and both LD modes. For all observers, measurement deviations from HD-CBCT were below 0.3 mm in the LD protocols (LD-CBCT depth: 0.22 ± 0.17 mm, width: 0.22 ± 0.13 mm; LD-CBCT* depth: 0.24 ± 0.23 mm, width: 0.25 ± 0.21 mm) and at 0.4 mm in IR. Conclusions: Absolute differences between LD-CBCT and HD-CBCT are small, although surrounding tissues decrease LD-CBCT image quality. Within the limitations of an in-vitro trial, LD-CBCT may become an adequate imaging modality for monitoring peri-implant lesions at a substantially decreased radiation dose.

Evaluating structural changes in oral epithelium can assist with the diagnosis of cancerous lesions. Two-dimensional (2D) non-invasive optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an established technique for this purpose. The objective of this study was to develop and test the diagnostic accuracy of a three-dimensional (3D) evaluation method. Methods: The oral lip mucosa of 10 healthy volunteers was scanned using an 870-nm spectral-domain OCT device (SD-OCT) with enhanced depth imaging (EDI). Four raters semi-automatically segmented the epithelial layer twice. Thus, eighty 3D datasets were created and analyzed for epithelial thickness. To provide a reference standard for comparison, the raters took cross-sectional 2D measurements at representative sites. The correlation between the 2D and 3D measurements, as well as intra-and inter-rater reliability, were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).Results: Mean epithelial thickness was 280 AE 64μm (range 178-500 μm) and 268 AE 49μm (range 163-425 μm) for the 2D and 3D analysis, respectively. The inter-modality correlation of the thickness values was good (ICC: 0.76 [0.626-0.846]), indicating that 3D analysis of epithelial thickness provides valid results. Intra-rater and interrater reliability were good (3D analysis) and excellent (2D analysis), suggesting high reproducibility. Conclusions: Diagnostic accuracy was high for the developed 3D analysis of oral epithelia using non-invasive, radiation-free OCT imaging. Clinical significance: This new 3D technique could potentially be used to improve time-efficiency and quality in the diagnosis of epithelial lesions compared with the 2D reference standard.