EA cannot generally be recommended as a pain-relieving method at oocyte aspiration but might be an alternative for women desiring a non-pharmacological method. An advantage of EA is less post-operative tiredness and confusion compared with CA.

No abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) patients suffer from diverse gait deficits depending on the severity of their injury. Gait assessments can objectively track the progress during rehabilitation and support clinical decision making, but a comprehensive gait analysis requires far more complex setups and time-consuming protocols that are not feasible in the daily clinical routine. As using inertial sensors for mobile gait analysis has started to gain ground, this work aimed to develop a sensor-based gait analysis for the specific population of SCI patients that measures the spatio-temporal parameters of typical gait laboratories for day-to-day clinical applications. The proposed algorithm uses shank-mounted inertial sensors and personalized thresholds to detect steps and gait events according to the individual gait profiles. The method was validated in nine SCI patients and 17 healthy controls walking on an instrumented treadmill while wearing reflective markers for motion capture used as a gold standard. The sensor-based algorithm (i) performed similarly well for the two cohorts and (ii) is robust enough to cover the diverse gait deficits of SCI patients, from slow (0.3 m/s) to preferred walking speeds.

Neurorehabilitation is progressively shifting from purely in-clinic treatment to therapy that is provided in both clinical and home-based settings. This transition generates a pressing need for assessments that can be performed across the entire continuum of care, a need that might be accommodated by application of wearable sensors. A first step toward ubiquitous assessments is to augment validated and well-understood standard clinical tests. This route has been pursued for the assessment of motor functioning, which in clinical research and practice is observation-based and requires specially trained personnel. In our study, 21 patients performed movement tasks of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), one of the most widely used clinical tests of upper limb motor functioning, while trained evaluators scored each task on pre-defined criteria. We collected data with just two wrist-worn inertial sensors to guarantee applicability across the continuum of care and used machine learning algorithms to estimate the ARAT task scores from sensor-derived features. Tasks scores were classified with approximately 80% accuracy. Linear regression between summed clinical task scores (across all tasks per patient) and estimates of sum task scores yielded a good fit (R2 = 0.93; range reported in previous studies: 0.61–0.97). Estimates of the sum scores showed a mean absolute error of 2.9 points, 5.1% of the total score, which is smaller than the minimally detectable change and minimally clinically important difference of the ARAT when rated by a trained evaluator. We conclude that it is feasible to obtain accurate estimates of ARAT scores with just two wrist worn sensors. The approach enables administration of the ARAT in an objective, minimally supervised or remote fashion and provides the basis for a widespread use of wearable sensors in neurorehabilitation.