An estimated 25 million people identify as transgender worldwide, approximately 1 million of whom reside in the United States. The increasing visibility and acceptance of transgender people makes it likely that they will present in general surgical settings; therefore, perioperative health care providers must develop the knowledge and skills requisite for the safe management of transgender patients in the perioperative setting. Extant guidelines, such as those published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health and the University of California San Francisco Center of Excellence for Transgender Health, serve as critical resources to those caring for transgender patients; however, they do not address their unique perioperative needs. It is essential that anesthesia providers develop the knowledge and skills necessary for safely managing transgender patients in the perioperative setting. This review provides an overview of relevant terminology, the imperative for the provision of culturally sensitive care, and guidelines for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management of the transgender patient.

Delivery of culturally competent care toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) patients depends on how health-care providers (HCPs) communicate with them; however, research about knowledge, attitude, and behavior of HCPs toward LGBT patients is scant. The objectives of our study were to describe oncology HCPs' knowledge and examine if beliefs about LGB and transgender patients mediate the effects of LGBT health-care knowledge on open communication behaviors with LGB and transgender patients, respectively. A total of 1253 HCPs (187 physicians, 153 advance practice professionals (APPs), 828 nurses, and 41 others) at a Comprehensive Cancer Center completed an online survey that included the following measures:LGBT health-care knowledge, beliefs, communication behaviors, willingness to treat LGBT patients, encouragingLGBT disclosure, and perceived importance of LGBT sensitivity training. Only 50 participants (5%) correctly answered all 7 knowledge items, and about half the respondents answered 3 (out of 7) items correctly. Favorable beliefs about LGBT health care mediated the effect of higher LGBT health-care knowledge on open communication behaviors with transgender patients, controlling for effects of type of profession, religious orientation, gender identity, sexual orientation, and having LGBT friends/family. The results of this study demonstrated an overall lack of medical knowledge and the need for more education about LGBT health care among oncology HCPs.Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) is an umbrella term that refers to sexual minority (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual) and gender minority (e.g., transgender, nonbinary, genderqueer) populations. While estimates vary, population surveys suggest between 5.2 and 9.5 million adults in the United States identify as LGBT (Gates, 2014). Barriers to equitable health care are multifactorial and include the experiences of these populations with the health-care system (Institute of Medicine (IOM), 2011). Evidence suggests that LGBT populations are at greater risk for breast, prostate, anal, cervical, colorectal, endometrial, and lung cancers when compared to the general population (Quinn et al., 2015), due to higher

Meaningful reductions in SSI can be achieved by implementing a multidisciplinary care bundle at a hospital-wide level.

The PEMAT is a useful supplement to reading level alone in the assessment of educational materials.

Purpose/Objectives To describe patient engagement as a patient safety strategy from the perspective of hospitalized surgical oncology patients. Research Approach Qualitative, descriptive approach using grounded theory. Setting A National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center in the northeastern United States. Participants Thirteen hospitalized surgical oncology patients. Methodological Approach Grounded theory with maximum variation sampling. Findings Participants’ perceptions regarding their engagement as a patient safety strategy were expressed through three overarching themes: 1) the word patient obscures the message; 2) safety is a shared responsibility; and 3) involvement in safety is a right. Themes were further defined by eight subthemes. Interpretation Using direct messaging, such as “your safety” as opposed to “patient safety” and teaching patients specific behaviors to maintain their safety appear to facilitate patient engagement and increase awareness of safety issues. Patients may be willing to accept some responsibility for ensuring their safety by engaging in behaviors that are intuitive or that they are clearly instructed to do, however they describe their involvement in their safety as a right, not an obligation. Implications for Nursing Clear, inviting, multimodal communication appears to have the greatest potential to enhance patients’ engagement in their safety. Nurses’ ongoing assessment of patients’ ability to engage is critical in so far as it provides the opportunity to encourage engagement without placing undue burden on them. By employing communication techniques that consider patients’ perspectives, nurses can support patient engagement. Knowledge Translation Nurses must identify creative ways to infuse information related to patients’ safety into the delivery of care. Instructions should be provided clearly, accompanied by a simply stated rationale, and reinforced over time. Cues in the environment, such as thoughtfully placed signage, may also encourage patient engagement. Nurses should assess patients’ desire and ability to be engaged regularly, and extend communications encouraging engagement to patients’ visitors.