BACKGROUNDPrior data suggest that vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE)
bacteremia is associated with worse outcomes than vancomycin-sensitive
Enterococcus (VSE) bacteremia. However, many studies evaluating such
outcomes were conducted prior to the availability of effective VRE therapies.OBJECTIVETo systematically review VRE and VSE bacteremia outcomes among hospital patients in the
era of effective VRE therapy.METHODSElectronic databases and grey literature published between January 1997 and December
2014 were searched to identify all primary research studies comparing outcomes of VRE
and VSE bacteremias among hospital patients, following the availability of effective VRE
therapies. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital mortality, while total
hospital length of stay (LOS) was a secondary outcome. All meta-analyses were conducted
in Review Manager 5.3 using random-effects, inverse variance modeling.RESULTSAmong all the studies reviewed, 12 cohort studies and 1 case control study met
inclusion criteria. Similar study designs were combined in meta-analyses for mortality
and LOS. VRE bacteremia was associated with increased mortality compared with VSE
bacteremia among cohort studies (odds ratio [OR], 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI],
1.38–2.35; I2=0%; n=11); the case-control study estimate was similar, but not
significant (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 0.97–3.82). LOS was greater for VRE bacteremia patients
than for VSE bacteremia patients (mean difference, 5.01 days; 95% CI, 0.58–9.44];
I2=0%; n=5).CONCLUSIONSDespite the availability of effective VRE therapy, VRE bacteremia remains associated
with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and LOS when compared to VSE bacteremia.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;37(1):26–35
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.