Background Cosmetic surgery tourism is increasing exponentially. Patients seek cosmetic procedures within the United States and abroad, lured by lower cost procedures, shorter waiting lists, and affordable airfare and hotel accommodations. Unfortunately, operations are often performed by non–board-certified plastic surgeons, sometimes not even by plastic surgeons. Preoperative counseling, frequently limited to a video-chat with an office secretary, provides inadequate discussion regarding potential complications. Postoperative care is careless and rarely involves the operating surgeon. Complications are frequent, with management falling into the hands of plastic surgeons unfamiliar with the patient’s care. Furthermore, the physician, rather than the patient or hospital, faces the largest cost burden. Objectives The authors sought to explore their institution’s experience treating complications of cosmetic tourism and investigate associated costs. Methods The retrospective review of 16 patients treated for complications related to cosmetic surgery tourism plus cost analysis revealed a substantial discrepancy between money saved by undergoing surgery abroad and massive costs accrued to treat surgical complications. Results The most common complication was infection, often requiring surgery or IV antibiotics on discharge. Mean cost per patient was $26,657.19, ranging from $392 (single outpatient visit) to $154,700.79 (prolonged admission and surgery). Overall, the hospital retained 63% of billed charges, while physicians retained only 9%. The greatest amount paid by any single patient was $2635.00 by a patient with private insurance. Conclusions Cosmetic tourism has severe medical repercussions for patients and complications that burden hospitals, physicians, and the US medical system. Physicians treating the complications suffer the greatest financial loss. Level of Evidence: 4

Summary: Umbilical reconstruction is a procedure with widespread indications in the setting of congenital or postsurgical loss. Reconstruction of the umbilicus when no remnant of the natural umbilicus is present is also called neoumbilicoplasty. Numerous neoumbilicoplasty techniques have been published, including cartilage grafts, full-thickness skin grafts, and multiflap reconstruction. No consensus has been reached regarding an optimal technique, and many procedures involve complicated designs with small flaps that are difficult to reproduce or explain. The authors divide patients into three types depending on the thickness of the adipose layer of the abdomen. With appropriate patient selection and minor variations depending on patient type, the technique can be applied to all patients. The umbilicus is marked in the appropriate position. Local anesthesia is infiltrated, and the area beneath the skin is defatted. The dermis is then applied to the underlying fascia with a superior shift. The authors describe the technique and its variations and present one illustrative case with additional supplemental digital content. The authors have gone through a progression of techniques to find a simple surgical method yielding consistently reproducible results with minimal complexity, limited morbidity, and an aesthetic final outcome. The authors believe that the technique described here achieves those goals. It can be performed under local anesthetic and with a simple occlusive dressing so that the patient can go on with most of his or her daily activities. There is no scar to suggest a surgical procedure, and patients are extremely happy with the aesthetic outcomes.

Background: Compartment syndrome of the upper extremity is a surgical emergency that, when left untreated, can have dire consequences. Its causes are numerous, one of which is the uncommon entity hereditary angioedema, an autosomal dominant disease resulting in edema in a variety of potential locations, including the extremities. This is only the second time hereditary angioedema has been mentioned in the literature as a cause of compartment syndrome. Methods: We present a case of hereditary angioedema leading to hand and forearm compartment syndrome in a 13-year-old pediatric patient. Diagnosis of hereditary angioedema was made by our Rheumatology colleagues with physical exam and a thorough history, and confirmed by laboratory studies. Results: Our patient presented with compartment syndrome of the hand and forearm and underwent hand and volar forearm fasciotomies. She was subsequently worked up for hereditary angioedema with laboratory results confirming the diagnosis. She was discharged after a 5-day hospitalization with prophylactic C1-inhibitor therapy. Conclusions: Hereditary angioedema is a rare but known cause of compartment syndrome of the upper extremity, and must be considered when patients present with compartment syndrome of unknown etiology. This disease can be diagnosed by laboratory studies and symptoms can be controlled with medical therapy.