Dopamine (DA) D1-like receptors are present in pathways implicated in feedback control of midbrain DA neurons. However, stimulation of these receptors either produces no effect on DA cells, or the effect is inconsistent. It is possible that the expression of a D1 feedback effect requires co-activation of D2-like receptors. To test this hypothesis, we recorded extracellularly the spontaneous activity of nigral DA cells in a low cerveau isolé rat preparation. SKF38393 and dyhydrexidine, two D1 agonists, were administered systemically to animals pretreated with different doses of the D2 agonist quinpirole. Supporting the hypothesis, the two D1 agonists consistently inhibited DA cells in animals given high doses of quinpirole (Ն40 g/kg, i.v.). However, no significant D1 effect was observed in animals pretreated with only low doses (Յ20 g/kg) of quinpirole. Because low doses of D2 agonists preferentially act on DA autoreceptors, and because the D1 inhibition persisted in animals whose DA autoreceptors were blocked by intranigral application of raclopride, our results suggest that the expression of D1 feedback inhibition requires co-activation of D2-like receptors on DA target neurons, instead of DA neurons themselves. These results, together with the finding that chloral hydrate completely blocked the D1 inhibition, may explain why previous studies have failed to show a consistent D1 effect on DA cells and suggest that drugs designed to act specifically on one subtype of DA receptor may, via feedback pathways, influence the action of endogenous DA on other DA receptor subtypes as well.

Current antipsychotic drugs are thought to inhibit central dopamine (DA) transmission by blocking DA receptors. Here, we provide evidence that the atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine may produce part of its effect by inhibiting a subset of excitatory inputs to DA neurons. Thus, in chloral hydrate-anesthetized rats, systemic administration of D-amphetamine produced two opposing effects on DA neurons in the ventral tegmental area. Under control conditions, D-amphetamine inhibited the firing of the cell through D2-like receptors. When D2-like receptors were blocked by raclopride, D-amphetamine excited DA neurons, instead of producing no effect. The excitation, expressed as an increase in firing rate and a slow oscillation in firing pattern, was suppressed by the adrenergic a1 receptor antagonist prazosin, suggesting an involvement of a1 receptors. In rats pretreated with the typical antipsychotic drug haloperidol, D-amphetamine also excited DA neurons. However, when given after clozapine, D-amphetamine produced no significant effects. The failure of D-amphetamine to produce an excitation is not due to an incomplete blockade of D2-like receptors by clozapine because co-treatment with clozapine and raclopride also failed to enable the excitatory effect of D-amphetamine. The suggestion that clozapine inhibits the excitatory effect of D-amphetamine is further supported by the finding that clozapine, given after D-amphetamine, reliably reversed D-amphetamine-induced excitation in raclopride-treated rats. Thus, different from raclopride and haloperidol, clozapine may inhibit DA transmission through two additive mechanisms: blockade of DA receptors and inhibition of an amphetamine-sensitive, excitatory pathway that innervates DA neurons.