For cord blood sample, IL-6 or PCT can be used as reliable rule-in and rule-out tool. For maternal serum, only IL-6 appeared to be sufficient for rule-in diagnosis. An interventional study may be needed to answer whether the addition of these tests will improve the outcome of patients with EONS.
This study analyzes the significance of clinical and dosimetric risk factors in relation to chest wall (CW) injury after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumors. Our study shows that female sex, having a tumorto-CW distance of <16 to 25 mm, and the dosimetric parameters of maximal dose to 0.5 to 5 cm 3 and 30-Gy volume exposure of CW or rib are risk factors that predict CW toxicity. Purpose: The significance of clinical and dosimetric risk factors in relation to chest wall (CW) injury after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung tumors were analyzed through a meta-analysis of 57 published studies. Methods and Materials: Studies related to CW injury after lung SBRT were obtained through searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases. An estimate of the incidence of CW pain (CWP) or rib fracture (RF) was derived using a Bayesian hierarchical model. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between CWP or RF and clinical or dosimetric factors. Results: A total of 57 studies incorporating 5985 cases reporting clinical data on CW injury after SBRT were analyzed. The overall CWP and RF rates by Bayesian hierarchical modeling were 11.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-14.4) and 6.3% (95% CI, 3.7-9.7), respectively. The rates of grade !2 and grade !3 CWP were 6.2% (95% CI, 3.88-8.93) and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.48-2.12), respectively. Sex was significantly correlated with RF (P < .001), with female patients having a greater risk of RF than male patients (hazard ratio Z 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.76). No correlation was found between RF, grade !2 CWP, or grade !3 CWP, with the clinical and dosimetric factors of age, tumor size, origin of lung tumor, gross tumor volume, planning target volume, fractional dose, number of fractions, or biologically effective dose. However, tumor to NotedAn online CME test for this article can be taken at https:// academy.astro.org.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), an effective, locally directed therapy for unresectable liver metastases, can improve the survival of patients. As a functional imaging approach, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) or PET-computed tomography (PET-CT) may play a crucial role in the follow-up after RFA. Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET or PET-CT for the detection of residual tumor following RFA of liver metastases. Studies reporting the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET or PET-CT for patients with residual tumor after RFA of liver metastases were identified. The methodological quality of these studies was systematically evaluated, and the overall sensitivity and specificity of these data sets are reported. Seven studies involving 155 patients were examined. When (18)F-FDG PET or PET-CT was performed within 2 days of RFA, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 79% [95% confidence interval (CI): 70-87%] and 84% (95% CI: 75-91%), respectively. When (18)F-FDG PET or PET-CT was performed 1 week after treatment, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 48% (95% CI: 18-79%) and 94% (95% CI: 70-100%), respectively. Finally, when (18)F-FDG PET or PET-CT was performed 3 months after treatment, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 52% (95% CI: 22-81%) and 94% (95% CI: 70-100%), respectively. Both (18)F-FDG PET and PET-CT are effective in detecting residual tumor following RFA of liver metastases. The ideal time to perform these imaging studies is within 2 days of RFA treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.