Flow cytometric (FCM) immunophenotyping has an important role in the diagnostic work up of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens obtained from lymphoid lesions. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of this method with respect to referred FNA specimens. One hundred and two FNA specimens referred to our laboratory for FCM analysis during the last 3 years were studied. Specimens were sent, accompanied by cytological smears, from 11 distant hospitals by ordinary mail. The evaluation of potential B-cell monoclonality, the main diagnostic issue to be resolved using FCM, was possible in 86 of these 102 cases. The remaining 16 samples could not be analyzed or adequately interpreted because of sparse or necrotic material. A monoclonal B-cell population was found in 17/86 satisfactory cases, of which 16 were histologically confirmed. Eight cases contained cells positive for the epithelial marker Ber-EP4 and were diagnosed accordingly as carcinomas. FCM analysis of specimens obtained with a clinical question of Hodgkin lymphoma or T-cell lymphomas did not yield definitive data. The time lapse between sampling and analysis (12-84 hr) did not affect the results. This probably was due to the fact that all aspirates were taken in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) cell medium, supplemented with 50% fetal calf serum. In conclusion, this retrospective study establishes that it is possible, in the majority of cases, to refer FNA material for FCM immunophenotyping by mail, and that results regarding B-cell clonality in the case of small-cell lymphomas are reliable also after a transportation period of 3-4 days. Carcinoma may be similarly diagnosed and a diagnosis of lymphoma may be excluded in reactive proliferations. Cases with only a few atypical cells or specimens from patients suspected of having Hodgkin lymphoma or T-cell lymphomas are not suitable for analysis by FCM.
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the role of chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL13) in morphine tolerance in rats with cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP).Material/MethodsWe established a rat CIBP model and a rat CIBP-morphine tolerance (BM) model. BM rats were intrathecally administered rmCXCL13, neutralizing anti-CXCL13, and normal saline, while the control group rats underwent a sham operation and were injected with normal saline. The morphine analgesia was assessed by measuring mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT) and mechanical withdrawal duration (MWD) at various time points. The co-expressions of CXCL13 and NeuN were measured by immunofluorescence double-staining. CXCL13 protein and mRNA expressions were detected by Western blot and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), respectively.ResultsCompared to the sham-operation (S) group, the BM group showed obviously decreased MWT and increased MWD on Day 9 after CIBP, but obviously increased MWT and decreased MWD on Day 3 after morphine administration; subsequently, the MWT was decreased and MWD was increased (all P<0.05). In comparison with the S+saline group, increased MWT and decreased MWD were observed in BM rats on Day 3 after anti-CXCL13 administration, and obviously decreased MWT and increased MWD were found in BM rats on Day 3 after rmCXCL13 administration (all P<0.05).ConclusionsUp-regulated CXCL13 has a negative role in morphine analgesia in relief of CIBP, which may provide a new target for the management of CIBP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.