Background: The endovascular approach has been widely used for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), especially for aortic bifurcation and iliac artery Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC-II) A and B lesions. However, the outcomes of self-expanding covered stents (SECSs) for extensive aortoiliac lesion remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the short-term patency of kissing covered stents for the revascularization of aortoiliac TASC-II C and D diseases. Methods: Thirty-three patients with TASC-II C and D lesions of AIOD were treated with kissing covered stents. All patients were reviewed under a standard institutional review board protocol. Demographic variables, lesion location and characteristics, stenting configuration, and patency were analyzed.Results: Thirty-one male and 2 female patients with a mean age of 65.1 ± 10.7 years underwent aortoiliac bifurcation reconstruction with kissing SECSs. Eight patients had TASC-II C lesions, and 25 patients had TASC-II D lesions. Among them, 8 patients had total infrarenal aortoiliac occlusion, of which 5 had juxtarenal aortoiliac lesions. The mean lesion length was 11.6 ± 2.1 cm. Mean diameters of aorta and common iliac artery were 18.3 ± 2.1 and 10.7 ± 1.5 mm, respectively. Among them, the abutting stent configuration was used in 11 patients with short or focal ostial lesions, whereas the crossing stent configuration was used in 22 patients with longer lesions extending into the distal aorta. The mean follow-up was 24.5 ± 7.8 months, the follow-up rate was 93.9% (31 of 33), and 29 patients had follow-up longer than 12 months. Primary patency rate at 12 months was 96.5%, and secondary patency rate was 100%. Conclusions: The use of kissing SECSs for the revascularization of extensive AIOD is safe and effective. The short-term primary patency rates of endovascular treatment of TASC-II C and D lesions were favorable.

Objective Post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension is a well-recognized phenomenon closely related to surgical complications. This study aimed to determine whether different kinds of perioperative antihypertensive drugs had a protective effect on post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension and influence on intraoperative hemodynamics. Method We retrospectively investigated 102 carotid stenosis patients who underwent conventional endarterectomy with a perioperative baseline antihypertensive regimen. Post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension was defined as a postoperative peak systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg and/or a requirement for any additional antihypertensive therapies. We compared the clinical characteristics and types of baseline perioperative antihypertensive drugs between patients with and without post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension and then determined the significant independent effect of antihypertensive drugs on post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension through multivariate regression and detected their influence on intraoperative hypertension (induction-related systolic blood pressure and vasodilators consumption) and hemodynamic depression (intra-arterial systolic blood pressure ≤100 mmHg and/or heart rate ≤50 beats/min). We also investigated adverse events such as stroke, death, myocardial infarction, and cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome during the postoperative hospitalization. Results A total of 52/102 (51.0%) patients were defined as having post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension during the first three days postoperative, including eight patients with a postoperative systolic blood pressure that exceeded 160 mmHg at least once, 31 patients requiring postoperative antihypertensive treatment in addition to their baseline regimen, and 13 patients with both. The incidence of stroke/death/myocardial infarction and cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after conventional endarterectomy during hospitalization were both 1.9%. A significantly increased risk of composite postoperative complications (including cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome, hyperperfusion-related symptoms, transient ischemic attacks, stroke, death, and cardiac complications) was observed in patients with post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension than without (15.4% versus 2.0%, p = 0.032). Patients free of post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension had a higher incidence of perioperative baseline β-blocker use than patients who suffered from post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension (46.0% versus 21%, p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, β-blocker use was a significant independent protective factor for post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension (OR = 0.356, 95% CI: 0.146–0.886, p = 0.028). Patients taking β-blockers had a lower postoperative peak systolic blood pressure than the β-blocker-naïve population (137.1 ± 12.1 mmHg versus 145.0 ± 11.2 mmHg, p = 0.008), but the postoperative mean systolic blood pressure showed no intergroup difference. However, the incidence of hemodynamic depression during conventional endarterectomy was higher in patients with perioperative β-blocker use than in those without (44.1% versus 25.0%, p = 0.050). The difference in intraoperative hemodynamic depression became more prominent between the β-blocker and non-β-blocker groups (81.8% versus 33.3%, p = 0.014) for whose preoperative baseline heart rate was equal to or lower than 70 beats/min. Conclusion The perioperative use of β-blockers is a protective factor for post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension and contributes to stabilizing the postoperative peak systolic blood pressure three days after conventional endarterectomy. However, β-blockers might also lead to intraoperative hemodynamic depression, especially for patients with a low baseline heart rate.

Purpose: A low ABI, ≦0.9, indicates peripheral artery disease (PAD) and physical activity (PA) represents an important non-surgical treatment for patients with PAD. However, as for the general population, the associations between PA, PAD, and their mutual dependence are not well-defined. Here we aimed to determine whether there is a dose–response relationship between PA and incidence of PAD in the general population using restricted cubic spline (RCS).Patients and methods: This study analyzed 1,370 adults aged ≧40 years who had participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) during 1999–2004. The ABI of the participants were measured by trained technicians, and PAD was defined as ABI ≦0.9. PA was obtained with a standard questionnaire, and metabolic equivalents (MET) were used to quantify the PA level. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between PA and incidence of PAD, and the dose–response relationship was analyzed with RCS.Results: PAD was present in 6.2% of the participants: 5.6% of males and 6.9% of females. After adjusting for potential confounders, compared with the first quartile (Q1) of MET, the odds ratios (ORs) of PAD for those with Q2, Q3, and Q4 of MET were 0.688 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.684–0.692], 0.463 (95% CI = 0.460–0.466), 0.816 (95% CI = 0.812–0.821), respectively (all p < 0.0001). The RCS regression showed that physical activity was related to the incidence of PAD in a non-linear manner (p for non-linearity < 0.0001). For females, the prevalence of PAD decreased as physical activity increased, reaching the minimum for activity at ~5,800 MET-min month−1 (OR = 0.425, 95% CI = 0.424–0.426), and for males, no plateau was found in this study.Conclusion: The prevalence of PAD is inversely associated with PA, and vigorous activities might help decrease PAD risk for general population. The prevalence of PAD reaches the minimum at ~5,800 MET-min month−1, representing a recommended PA value.