The etiology of adolescent myopia involves genetic and environmental factors. The pathological mechanism of modern medicine includes blood perfusion, changes in blood molecules, neurotransmitters, and sclera remodeling. Chinese medicine believes that myopia is mainly related to the deficiency of liver blood and spleen and stomach disorders. The prevention and treatment of myopia in adolescents are very important, but in terms of the current incidence of myopia in adolescents and the level of clinical diagnosis and treatment, its prevention and treatment are insufficient. Modern medicine and traditional Chinese medicine both pay attention to integrity, so adolescent myopia should not only pay attention to eye changes but also pay attention to other body systems and other aspects of change. Intestinal flora has become a research hotspot in recent years, and it has been found that it is closely associated with multi-system and multi-type diseases. No studies have directly investigated the link between Intestinal flora and myopia in adolescents. Therefore, by summarizing the pathological mechanism of adolescent myopia and the connection between intestinal flora and the pathological mechanism of adolescent myopia, this paper analyzes the possible pathological mechanism of the influence of intestinal flora on adolescent myopia, providing a theoretical basis for future studies on the correlation between changes of intestinal flora and its metabolites and the incidence of adolescent myopia, which is of great significance for the study on the risk prediction of adolescent myopia.

Stroke causes varying degrees of neurological deficits, leading to corresponding dysfunctions. There are different therapeutic principles for each stage of pathological development. Neuroprotection is the main treatment in the acute phase, and functional recovery becomes primary in the subacute and chronic phases. Neuroplasticity is considered the basis of functional restoration and neurological rehabilitation after stroke, including the remodeling of dendrites and dendritic spines, axonal sprouting, myelin regeneration, synapse shaping, and neurogenesis. Spatiotemporal development affects the spontaneous rewiring of neural circuits and brain networks. Microglia are resident immune cells in the brain that contribute to homeostasis under physiological conditions. Microglia are activated immediately after stroke, and phenotypic polarization changes and phagocytic function are crucial for regulating focal and global brain inflammation and neurological recovery. We have previously shown that the development of neuroplasticity is spatiotemporally consistent with microglial activation, suggesting that microglia may have a profound impact on neuroplasticity after stroke and may be a key therapeutic target for post-stroke rehabilitation. In this review, we explore the impact of neuroplasticity on post-stroke restoration as well as the functions and mechanisms of microglial activation, polarization, and phagocytosis. This is followed by a summary of microglia-targeted rehabilitative interventions that influence neuroplasticity and promote stroke recovery.

Background: To evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with task-oriented training (TOT) on upper limb function in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Computer searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of science, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang, and Wipu databases were conducted from the time of database creation to October 27, 2022. Clinical trials meeting the inclusion criteria were screened, with rTMS combined with TOT in the test group and other therapies in the control group. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by 2 investigators, and meta-analysis was performed using Stata software after quality evaluation of the literature. Results: Meta-analysis results showed that repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with TOT was more effective in box and block test (I2 = 0%, P = .820, 95% confidence interval [CI] [−0.20, 0.88]), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (I2 = 0%, P = .569, 95% CI [0.88, 1.26]), and modified Barthel Index (I2 = 39.9%, P = .189, 95% CI [0.45, 1.03]) were not significantly different from controls, and the efficacy was significantly better in motor evoked potentials (I2 = 86.5%, P < .001, 95% CI [−1.38, −0.83]). Conclusions: Data analysis clarified the efficacy of rTMS) combined with TOT on upper extremity motor function disorders after stroke, but there was no significant difference between the efficacy in box and block test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and modified Barthel Index and the efficacy in motor evoked potentials between rTMS and the control group, suggesting that the neuro plasticizing effect of rTMS may translate into functional improvement by promoting neuro electrical signaling.