Introduction: Bortezomib has been reported to favourably impact the outcomes of t(4;14) and del(17p) in multiple myeloma (MM), but its impact on gain 1q (+1q) is unknown. Methods: To address this, 250 patients treated with bortezomib-based induction were analysed. All myeloma samples had fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) performed on CD138-sorted bone marrow aspirate, and plasma cells were analysed using DNA probes specific for the following chromosomal aberrations: del(13q14), del(17p), t(14;16), t(4;14), and +1q. Presence of +1q was defined as the presence of at least three copies of 1q21 at the cut off level of 20% of bone marrow plasma cells. Results: +1q identified in 167 (66.8%) and associated with t(4;14) and high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). +1q was not associated with response rate but shorter event-free survival (EFS) (median EFS 35 vs 55 months, p = 0.05) and overall survival (OS) (median OS 74 vs 168 months, p = 0.00025). Copy number and clone size did not impact survival. Multivariate analysis showed +1q was an independent adverse factor for OS together with International Staging System (ISS)3, high LDH, del(17p) and t(4;14). When a risk score of 1 was assigned to each independent adverse factor, OS was shortened incrementally by a risk score from 0 to 4. Post-relapse/progression survival was inferior in those with +1q (median 60 vs 118 months, p = 0.000316). Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improved OS for those with +1q (median OS 96 vs 49 months, p = 0.000069). Conclusion: +1q is an adverse factor for OS in MM uniformly treated with bortezomib-based induction but was partially mitigated by ASCT. A risk scoring system comprising +1q, LDH, high-risk FISH, and ISS is a potential tool for risk stratification in MM.

Background Rheumatic diseases are related to both abnormal bone turnover and atherogenesis, but a mechanistic link was missing. Methods and Results We investigated the effect of cumulative rheumatic inflammation ( CRI ) on risk of coronary calcification in a retrospective cohort of 145 rheumatoid arthritis patients. A time‐adjusted aggregate CRI score was derived by conglomerating all quarterly biomarker encounters of serum C‐reactive protein over 60 months immediately preceding computed tomography coronary angiography. Flow cytometry was performed to measure the osteocalcin‐positive ( OCN + ) CD 34 + KDR + and OCN + CD 34 + circulating endothelial progenitor cells ( EPCs ). Conventional early circulating EPCs CD 34 + CD 133 + KDR + was determined. Coronary calcification was defined as any Agatston score >0. 50% of patients (n=72/145) had coronary calcification. CRI score was associated with presence of coronary calcification ( P =0.004) (multivariable‐adjusted: highest versus lowest quartile: odds ratio=5.6 [95% CI 1.1–28.9], P =0.041). Receiver operating characteristics curve revealed divergent behavior of OCN ‐expressing circulating EPCs ( OCN + CD 34 + EPCs : area under the curve=0.60, P =0.034; OCN + CD 34 + KDR + EPCs : area under the curve=0.59, P =0.053, positive predictors) versus conventional early EPCs ( CD 34 + CD 133 + KDR + : area under the curve=0.60, P =0.034, negative predictor) for coronary calcification, which persisted after multivariable adjustments ( OCN + CD 34 + KDR + [>75th percentile]: odds ratio=7.2 [95% CI 1.8–27.9], P =0.005; OCN + CD 34 + EPCs [>75th percentile]: odds ratio=6.0 [95% CI 1.5–23.3], P =...

Objectives: Myeloma relapse remains challenging. Daratumumab (dara) with immunomodulatory agents (IMiD) and dexamethasone (dex) was proven highly effective in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in randomized controlled trials. The recommended schedule of dara is weekly for eight doses, followed by 2-weekly for eight doses, and then every 4-weekly thereafter. However, the cost of daratumumab is daunting, precluding widespread and prolonged use in some countries. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of using a 3-weekly daratumumab regimen in RRMM. Methods: Thirteen RRMM patients were treated with dara-IMiD-dex till maximal response, followed by single-agent IMiD maintenance until disease progression. Dara (every 6 weekly) would be added upon significant biochemical disease progression. Results: After a median of four daratumumab infusions (range: 3-10), the best responses included complete response (CR) in seven patients (53.8%), very good partial response (VGPR) in four patients (30.8%), and partial response (PR) in two patients (15.4%). The median time to VGPR was four weeks. At 10 months, the overall survival was 90%, and progression-free survival was 54.7%. Two of three patients tested achieved MRD-ve CR. Another patient, who had PET-CT reassessment, showed PET-ve CR. Discussion: Despite less frequent daratumumab use, we reported rapid responses with a median time to VGPR of only four weeks, and a response rate of 100% including CR rate of 54%. Despite less frequent daratumumab use, grade ¾ neutropenia remained common with a frequency comparable to that observed in Pollux. Conclusion: This 3-weekly dara-IMiD-dex regimen preserves a high efficacy with rapid, deep responses including MRD-ve and PET-ve CR, hence a cost-effective regimen.