No abstract

The spread of fake news (hoax) is increasingly prevalent nowadays. Hoax is fake news that often appears on the internet and aims to spread panic and mass fear. Many irresponsible individuals carried out an activity to achieve a goal that can cause unrest, chaos, and disrupt state security. The research objective is to understand the criminal provisions in the ITE Law into conditions that follow the development of the criminal act of spreading hoaxes—knowing the policy formulation in handling the spread of fake news (hoax) through social media in Indonesia in the future. The approach method used in this research is a normative juridical approach. The types of data used in this study are secondary data and primary data. This research is classified as a kind of qualitative research. The results of this study indicate that: The provisions that follow the development of the criminal act of spreading fake news (hoax) are seen from several aspects. First, the factory itself, the second legal factor of law enforcement officers, the third is facilities and infrastructure, fourth, the community factor. In terms of this aspect, the formulation of criminal law in dealing with fake news in the future looks better and more complete, especially in the concept of the Criminal Code, which regulates things that can be convicted regarding fake news and hate speech, the form of fake news and hate speech in cyberspace. The current criminal law policy still has shortcomings, especially in terms of policy formulation.

Abstract. Decision Number 668/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Tjk is an example of a car embezzlement case that was credited from PT. U FINANCE INDONESIA criminal liability in the credit agreement is imposed on the party who deliberately takes the action as described in Article 372 of the Criminal Code. The purpose of this study is to understand criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of embezzlement of leasing cars related to article 372 of the Criminal Code concerning embezzlement and the prevention of perpetrators of embezzlement of leasing cars associated with article 372 of the Criminal Code concerning embezzlement. To achieve this goal, it is carried out using normative juridical methods, descriptive analysis data collection techniques, literature studies using secondary data, and normative analysis. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that an act against the law can be said to be embezzlement if it fulfills the elements of Article 372 of the Criminal Code, namely whoever, intentionally, against the right/against the law takes something that wholly or partly belongs to another person, who is in his power not because of the crime. The application of criminal law is one of the efforts to overcome crime. Crime prevention efforts need to be taken with a policy approach, namely a combination of crime prevention efforts with penalties (after it occurs) and (before it occurs). Criminal tackling or criminal policies are divided into penal efforts and non-penal efforts, penal efforts are repressive efforts (suppression/eradication/suppression) after a crime has occurred, while non-penal efforts are crime prevention efforts that focus more on efforts to prevent crime. efforts that are preventive in nature (prevention/deterrence/control) before the crime occurs. Abstrak. Putusan Nomor 668/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Tjk merupakan contoh kasus penggelapan mobil yang dikredit dari PT. U FINANCE INDONESIA maka Pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam perjanjian kredit dikenakan pada pihak yang dengan sengeja melakukan tindakan sebagaimana dijelaskan dalam Pasal 372 KUHP. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap pelaku penggelapan mobil leasing dihubungkan dengan pasal 372 KUHP tentang penggelepan dan penanggulangan terhadap pelaku penggelapan mobil leasing dihubungkan dengan pasal 372 KUHP tentang penggelapan. Untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, teknik pengumpulan data deskriptif analisis, studi kepustakaan yang menggunakan data sekunder, serta analisis normatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa, perbuatan melawan hukum dapat dikatakan sebagai penggelapan apabila memenuhi unsur Pasal 372 KUHP yaitu barang siapa, dengan sengaja, melawan hak/melawan hukum mengambil barang sesuatu yang seluruhnya atau sebagian adalah kepunyaan orang lain, yang ada dalam kuasanya bukan karena kejahatan. Penerapan hukum pidana merupakan salah satu upaya penanggulangan kejahatan. Upaya penanggulangan kejahatan perlu ditempuh dengan pedekatan kebijakan, yaitu perpaduan antara upaya penanggulangan kejahatan dengan penal (sesudah terjadi) dan (sebelum terjadi). Penanggulangan pidana atau kebijakan kriminal dibagi menjadi upaya penal dan upaya non-penal, upaya penal adalah upaya–upaya yang sifatnya repressive (penindasan/pemberantasan/penumpasan) sesudah kejahat terjadi, sedangkan upaya non-penal merupakan upaya penanggulangan kejahatan yang lebih menitikberatkan pada upaya-upaya yang sifatnya preventif (pencegahan/penangkalan/pengendalian) sebelum kejahatan tersebut terjadi.