Abstract. Currently criminal acts are growing with various types and modus operandi, in addition, criminal perpetrators also use technology to support the implementation of a crime. New types of crime are increasingly emerging including cyber terrorism, revenge porn, cybercrime, human trafficking, sexual violence against children and women and various other types of crimes. On the one hand, legal protection for victims is highlighted in the State of Indonesia where victims are often not protected as they should be entitled. On the other hand, marrying the victim to the perpetrator on the basis of maintaining the disgrace of prolonged trauma for the victim is what often happens today. In the case of children members of the DPRD committed rape in the city of Bekasi against women. Based on these issues, this study aims to find out the legal protection and rights for victims of rape crimes associated with law number 31 of 2014 concerning the protection of witnesses and victims. This research method uses normative juridical and this research is descriptive analysis. While the data used in this study is secondary data obtained from the results of literature and using qualitative descriptive analysis methods. So it was obtained that victims of rape crimes get legal protection stated in articles 5, 6, and 7 of law number 31 of 2014 concerning the protection of witnesses and victims in the form ofpensation and restitution. And victims also get medical assistance, psychosocial and psychological rehabilitation assistance, such assistance according to the Witness and Victim Protection Agency. Abstrak. Saat ini tindak pidana semakin berkembang dengan berbagai macam jenis dan modus operandinya, disamping itu para pelaku tindak pidana juga memanfaatkan teknologi guna mendukung terlaksananya suatu kejahatan. Berbagai jenis kejahatan baru semakin bermunculan diantaranya cyber terrorism, revenge porn, cybercrime, human trafficking, kekerasan seksual terhadap anak dan perempuan serta berbagai jenis kejahatan lainnya. Di satu sisi perlindungan hukum bagi korban tindak pidana pemerksoaan sangat disoroti di Negara Indonesia dimana bahwa korban seringkali tidak dilindungi hak haknya sebagaimana mestinya. Disisi lain menikahkan korban dengan pelaku atas dasar menjaga aib berujung trauma berkepanjangan bagi korban, inilah yang sering terjadi dewasa ini. Dalam kasus anak anggota DPRD melakukan pemerkosaan di kota Bekasi terhadap perempuan. Berdasarkan permasalahan tersebut maka penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum serta hak hak bagi korban tindak pidana pemerkosaan yang dihubungkan dengan undang undang nomor 31 tahun 2014 tentang perlindungan saksi dan korban. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif dan penelitian ini bersifat Deskriptif Analisis. Sedangkan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang diperoleh dari hasil kepustakaan dan menggunakan metode analisis Deskriptif Kualitatif. Maka diperoleh hasil bahwa korban tindak pidana pemerkosaan mendapatkan perlindungan hukum yang tertera pada pasal 5, 6, dan 7 undang undang nomor 31 tahun 2014 tentang perlindungan saksi dan korban berupa kompensasi dan restitusi. Dan korban pun memperoleh bantuan medis, bantuan rehabilitasi psikososial dan psikologis, bantuan tersebut sesuai Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban. Korban berhak mendapatkan perlindungan atas keamanan pribadi, keluarga, dan harta bendanya, serta bebas dari ancaman yang berkaitan dengan kesaksian yang akan, sedang, atau telah diberikannya berdasarkan undang undang nomor 31 tahun 2014 tentang perlindungan saksi dan korban.
Informed Consent as a legal implication of the general agreement regulated in Article 1320 BW is the embodiment of a therapeutic agreement which is included in the law of engagement, specifically a legal relationship between a number of legal subjects who bind themselves to do or not do something to another party. Therapeutic agreement is an agreement formed because of the legal relationship between doctor and patient. Legal relationship is the relationship between legal subjects or between legal subjects and legal objects, which are regulated by law. The conditions for the occurrence of a legal relationship are the existence of a legal basis, namely the legal regulations governing the relationship and the existence of legal events, namely events that have consequences regulated by law. Before giving medical treatment to the patient, based on Law no. 36 of 2009 concerning Health, Law no. 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice and Menistry of Health No. 585/Menkes/Per/IX/1989 concerning Approval of Medical Action which was later changed to Menistry of Health No. 290/Menkes/Per/III/2008 Regarding Medical Action Approval, doctors must obtain informed consent from their patients for medical treatment, since without that doctors can be legally blamed for their actions. This paper was made to know and understand that the informed consent is a form of therapeutic agreement in the effort of health services.
Abstract. This article is entitled Criminal Responsibility of Criminal Offenders in a State of Unconsciousness (Trance) According to the Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic Criminal Law. The method used in this paper is normative juridical methods connected with research on events that occur in society. The occurrence of crime the phenomenon of trance or in Indonesia is often known as "kerasukan", it is still difficult for the human mind to accept because it is beyond human reason. This phenomenon is also always associated with an element of culture and religion that prevails in Indonesia. The elements of a criminal act consist of subjective elements including the subject and the existence of an element of error and an element of purpose, namely acts that are against the law, actions that are prohibited or prohibited by law/legislation and the violators are subject to criminal sanctions, and are carried out in time, place and circumstances. certain. Criminal responsibility is born by passing on objective reproaches to actions that are stated as applicable criminal acts, and subjectively to the perpetrators of criminal acts who meet the requirements to be subject to a criminal penalty for their actions. In Islamic law, one element of criminal responsibility can occur if the act is committed voluntarily. An act can only be held criminally responsible if he is able to realize that his actions are against the law and can determine his will according to his conscience. Abstrak. Artikel ini berjudul Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Dalam Keadaan Tidak Sadar Diri (Trance) Menurut Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dihubungkan dengan meneliti kejadian yang terjadi di masyarakat. Terjadinya tindak pidana dalam keadaan tidak sadar diri (Trance) atau di Indonesia sering dikenal dengan istilah “kerasukan”, masih sulit untuk diterima oleh akal manusia dikarenakan berada diluar nalar manusia. Fenomena ini juga selalu dikaitkan oleh suatu unsur budaya dan agama yang berlaku di Indonesia. Unsur-unsur tindak pidana terdiri dari unsur subjektif meliputi subjek dan adanya unsur kesalahan dan unsur objektif yaitu perbuatan yang bersifat melawan hukum, tindakan yang dilarang atau diharuskan oleh undang-undang/perundangan dan terhadap pelanggarnya diancam pidana, dan dilakukan dalam waktu, tempat dan keadaan tertentu. Pertanggungjawaban pidana lahir dengan diteruskannya celaan yang bersifat objektif terhadap perbuatan yang dinyatakan sebagai tindak pidana yang berlaku, dan secara subjektif kepada pelaku tindak pidana yang memenuhi persyaratan untuk dapat dikenai suatu hukuman pidana karena perbuatannya. Dalam syari’at Islam, Salah satu unsur pertanggungjawaban pidana bisa terjadi apabila perbuatan itu dikerjakan dengan kemauan sendiri. Suatu perbuatan hanya dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawaban pidana apabila ia mampu menyadari bahwa perbuatannya bertentangan dengan hukum dan dapat menentukan kehendaknya sesuai dengan kesadarannya.
Abstract. Prison sanctions are excellent for law enforcement officials and problems in law enforcement in West Java, as a result of which the state budget swells for prisoners and the overcapacity of prison residents in the West Java region is a problem that needs to be addressed, this is in order to reconstruct new thinking in order to realize the goal of a more humanist punishment. The author examines the termination of prosecution of minor crimes through the application of restorative justice linked to the purpose of punishment with the aim of knowing and analyzing considerations for the application of restorative justice in minor crimes based on criminal law and to find out and analyze the juridical implications of restorative justice in Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice in the West Java High Prosecutor's Office. To achieve the above objectives, the author conducts descriptive research, which is to analyze and describe systematically, factually, and accurately the provisions related to Juridical implications regarding the termination of prosecution of minor criminal acts through the application of restorative justice. The type of research used is normative juridical using a statute approach. Data are obtained through the study of documents and analyzed using qualitative normative methods. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the consideration of stopping the prosecution of minor criminal cases in the West Java High Prosecutor's Office is a legal breakthrough in an effort to resolve criminal cases effectively based on the principles of balance, sense of justice, the principle of benefits and creating social welfare, The public prosecutor has the authority to stop prosecutions for the benefit of the victim and other protected legal interests in order to avoid negative stigma, avoidance of reprisals, response and harmony of society, and decency and public order by taking into account the principle of salus populi suprema lex which is meaningful "people's safety is the highest law" so the application of Restorative Justice is one of the appropriate solutions to reduce the capacity of prisoners from prisons in West Java. And the juridical implications of stopping the prosecution of minor criminal cases based on restorative justice show that the implementation mechanism has fulfilled the objectives of protecting human rights, the West Java High Prosecutor's Office And the juridical implications of stopping the prosecution of minor criminal cases based on restorative justice show that the implementation mechanism has fulfilled the objectives of protecting human rights, the West Java High Prosecutor's Office with its application puts forward the concept of restorative houses as a place for the peace process as well as a means of socialization to provide legal understanding to the community, Prosecutors have a strategic position and role in the law enforcement process within the framework of an integrated criminal justice system as a master of process or dominus litis whose one function is to screen a criminal case and determine whether or not a criminal case should be forwarded to the judiciary taking into account the purpose of the law. The paradigm of successful criminal law enforcement is no longer oriented as a means of retaliation, but rather the restoration of justice that does not focus on punishment. Abstrak. Sanksi pidana penjara menjadi primadona bagi aparat penegak hukum dan problematika dalam penegakan hukum (law enforcement) di Jawa Barat, akibatnya anggaran negara membengkak untuk narapidana dan over kapasitas penghuni lembaga pemasyarakatan di wilayah Jawa Barat menjadi permasalahan yang perlu ditanggulangi, hal ini dalam rangka merekonstruksi pemikiran baru guna mewujudkan tujuan pemidanaan yang lebih bersifat humanis. Penulis meneliti penghentian penuntutan tindak pidana ringan melalui penerapan restorative justice dihubungkan dengan tujuan pemidanaan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pertimbangan penerapan restorative justice dalam tindak pidana ringan berdasarkan hukum pidana serta untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis Implikasi yuridis restorative justice dalam Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif di Kejaksaan Tinggi Jawa Barat. Untuk mencapai tujuan di atas, penulis melakukan penelitian deskriptif, yaitu menganalisis dan menggambarkan secara sistematis, faktual, dan akurat ketentuan yang terkait Implikasi yuridis mengenai penghentian penuntutan tindak pidana ringan melalui penerapan keadilan restoratif. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Data diperoleh melalui studi dokumen dan dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode normatif kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, diketahui bahwa pertimbangan penghentian penuntutan perkara tindak pidana ringan di Kejaksaan Tinggi Jawa Barat merupakan terobosan hukum dalam upaya penyelesaian perkara pidana yang efektif berlandaskan asas keseimbangan, rasa keadilan, asas manfaat dan menciptakan kesejahteraan sosial, penuntut umum berwenang menghentikan penuntutan demi kepentingan korban dan kepentingan hukum lain yang dilindungi demi menghindari stigma negatif, penghindaran pembalasan, respon dan keharmonisan masyarakat, serta kesusilaan dan ketertiban umum dengan memperhatikan asas salus populi suprema lex yang bermakna “keselamatan rakyat merupakan hukum tertinggi” maka penerapan Restorative Justice merupakan salah satu solusi yang tepat guna mengurangi jumlah kapasitas narapidana dari Lapas di Jawa Barat. Dan Implikasi yuridis penghentian penuntutan perkara tindak pidana ringan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif menunjukan bahwa mekanisme pelaksanaannya telah memenuhi tujuan perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia, Kejaksaan Tinggi Jawa Barat dengan penerapannya mengedepankan konsep rumah restoratif sebagai tempat proses perdamaian sekaligus sarana sosialisasi untuk memberikan pemahaman hukum kepada masyarakat, Jaksa memiliki posisi dan peran strategis dalam proses penegakan hukum dalam bingkai sistem peradilan pidana terpadu sebagai master of process atau dominus litis yang salah satu fungsinya menyaring sebuah perkara pidana dan menentukan perlu tidaknya sebuah perkara pidana diteruskan kepersidangan dengan mempertimbangkan tujuan hukum. Paradigma keberhasilan penegakan hukum pidana tidak lagi berorientasi sebagai sarana pembalasan, melainkan pemulihan keadilan yang tidak menitik beratkan pada penghukuman.
Abstract. This research is motivated by the increasing number of corruption cases conducted by prosecutors as law enforcement officials in Indonesia. Corruption itself is included in White Collor Crime where the crime is committed by the stakeholders, so that in the settlement of the case there is often a disparity of verdicts due to conflicts of interest of some parties. The purpose of this research is to find out indications of criminal disparity in corruption cases and the causes of criminal disparity in corruption cases. Therefore this research is categorized qualitative research with the research method used is normative juridical, The material studied in normative legal research is library material or secondary data. The data collection techniques used in this study are the study of literature and internet media, by collecting data from books, scientific papers, laws, articles, journals, and documents related to those studied. The results of this study show that of the two corruption convictions that have been presented there is a disparity caused by several factors, the Panel of Judges is the main factor in the disparity of criminal verdicts because the Panel of Judges in each criminal corruption case varies, taking into account several reasons that can ease and incriminate the accused. Abstrak. Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh semakin banyaknya kasus korupsi yang dilakukan oleh jaksa sebagai aparat penegak hukum di Indonesia. Korupsi sendiri termasuk kedalam kejahatan kerah putih (White Collor Crime) dimana kejahatan tersebut dilakukan oleh para pemangku kekuasaan, sehingga pada penyelesaian kasusnya sering terjadi disparitas putusan karena adanya konflik kepentingan beberapa pihak. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui indikasi disparitas pidana dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan penyebab disparitas pidana dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini dikategorikan penelitian kualitatif dengan metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, Bahan yang diteliti di dalam peneltian hukum normatif adalah bahan pustaka atau data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah studi kepustakaan dan media internet, dengan mengumpulkan data dari buku-buku, karangan ilmiah, undang-undang, artikel, jurnal, dan dokumen-dokumen yang berkaitan dengan yang diteliti. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa dari kedua putusan tindak pidana korupsi yang telah dipaparkan terdapat disparitas yang disebabkan oleh beberapa faktor, Majelis Hakim merupakan faktor utama terjadinya disparitas putusan pidana karena Majelis Hakim pada setiap kasus tindak pidana korupsi berbeda-beda, dengan mempertimbangkan beberapa alasan yang dapat meringankan dan memberatkan terdakwa.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.