Introduction Glaucoma outcomes are closely associated with patients’ awareness of the disease. However, little is known about glaucoma awareness and knowledge in Addis Ababa, a densely populated and ethnolinguistically diverse capital city in Ethiopia, the second largest country in Africa. Methods We performed a cross-sectional survey in the ophthalmology waiting room at St. Paul’s Hospital, a tertiary care center in Addis Ababa. Respondents included patients, patient family members, and non-clinical staff. Participants were asked if they had read or heard about glaucoma to gauge basic awareness of the disease; those with awareness were asked to take a quiz to measure their objective glaucoma knowledge. We performed multivariable regression to identify factors associated with glaucoma awareness, quiz performance, and self-rated ability to use eye drops. Results Of 298 respondents, 145 (48.7%) were female, and the average age was 44.9 ± 17.2 years. A majority (167; 56.0%) had primary school or less than primary school education. Only 131 (44.0%) had basic glaucoma awareness. Of these, 95 (72.5%) knew that glaucoma causes permanent vision loss, 103 (78.6%) knew glaucoma is often asymptomatic in early stages, 62 (47.3%) identified elevated intraocular pressure as a glaucoma risk factor, and 124 (94.7%) knew glaucoma was treatable. A majority of this subset (126; 96.2%) said they would be willing to use medicated eye drops, and 130 (99.2%) indicated a willingness to undergo surgery if recommended. Education level was independently associated with glaucoma awareness ( p < 0.001) and glaucoma quiz performance ( p = 0.03). Conclusion In a population sample from an ophthalmology waiting room in Addis Ababa, glaucoma awareness was poor and most strongly associated with education level. Educational interventions at public health and provider-patient levels are warranted. Our results suggest high receptiveness to both medical and surgical treatment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40123-020-00314-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Purpose: Periocular and orbital anthropometric values vary among races. No studies have established normative exophthalmometry values for Ethiopians or the many Ethiopian ethnic groups. This study established a set of normative anthropometric values for exophthalmometry, and further evaluated whether these measurements differed based on sex or ethnic group. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in the ophthalmology department at St. Paul’s Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Two hundred ninety-six participants were recruited for the study. Sex, primary Ethiopian ethnic subgroup, and exophthalmometry measurements were recorded. Differences between ethnicities and sexes were evaluated using independent samples t test. Results: Average proptosis for the total cohort was 15.88 ± 2.49 mm, with 582 eyes measured. Females (15.87 ± 2.53, n = 286) and males (15.89 ± 2.49, n = 296) were not significantly different in their proptosis measurements. Within the 3 largest ethnic groups measured, Amhara (16.12 ± 2.67, n = 204), Oromo (15.43 ± 2.51, n = 172), and Gurage (16.23 ± 2.59, n = 98), the difference in proptosis measurement was significant between the Amhara and Oromo groups (p = 0.01), and the Oromo and Gurage groups (p = 0.01). The only ethnic group that was significantly different between sexes was Gurage, of which average female proptosis was 15.51 ± 2.74 (n = 54), while male proptosis was 17.13 ± 2.11 (n = 44) (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Mean Ethiopian proptosis values vary across ethnicities, are similar to those measured in other African populations, but are lower than those established in African-American populations. This study provides an important resource that Ethiopian ophthalmologists can use when evaluating patients with suspected ophthalmic and orbital disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.