Background:In women with a family history of breast cancer, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is associated with a decreased risk of subsequent breast cancer of approximately 90%. We examined the association between bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast cancer risk in women at high risk for breast cancer who also had mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Methods: We obtained blood samples from 176 of the 214 high-risk women who participated in our previous retrospective cohort study of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. We used conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis and direct sequence analysis of the blood specimens to identify women with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. The carriers' probabilities of developing breast cancer were estimated from two different penetrance models. Results: We identified 26 women with an alteration in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Eighteen of the mutations were considered to be deleterious and eight to be of uncertain clinical significance. None of the 26 women has developed breast cancer after a median of 13.4 years of followup (range, 5.8-28.5 years). Three of the 214 women are known to have developed a breast cancer after prophylactic mastectomy. For two of these women, BRCA1 and BRCA2 screening was negative, and no blood specimen was available for the third. Estimations of the effectiveness of prophylactic mastectomy were performed, considering this woman as both a mutation carrier and a noncarrier. These calculations

Breast cancer risk is greatly increased in women who carry mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Because breast cancer initiation is different between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women who do not carry mutations, it is possible that the mechanism of breast cancer progression is also different. Histopathologic and genetic studies have supported this hypothesis. To test this hypothesis further, we utilized a large cohort of women who underwent therapeutic mastectomy (TM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (PM). From this cohort, we developed case groups of women with a family history of breast cancer with BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations, with unclassified variant alterations, and with no detected mutation and matched these cases with sporadic controls from the same TM and PM cohort. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on paraffin sections by use of dual-color probes for ERBB2/CEP17, MYC/CEP8, TBX2/CEP17, and RPS6KB1/CEP17. All malignant and benign lesions, including putative precursor lesions, were studied. The invasive cancers from deleterious mutation carriers had a higher prevalence of duplication of MYC (P = 0.006) and TBX2 (P = 0.0008) compared to controls and a lower prevalence of ERBB2 amplification (P = 0.011). Coduplication of MYC and TBX2 was common in the in situ and invasive lesions from the deleterious mutation carriers. The odds ratio of having a BRCA1/2 mutation is 31.4 (95% CI = 1.7-569) when MYC and TBX2 are coduplicated but ERBB2 is normal. Unclassified variant carriers/no mutation detected and sporadic controls had a similar prevalence of alterations, suggesting that hereditary patients with no deleterious mutations follow a progression pathway similar to that of sporadic cases. With the exception of one atypical ductal hyperplasia lesion, no putative precursor lesion showed any detectable alteration of the probes tested. There was no significant intratumoral heterogeneity of genetic alterations. Our data confirm that a specific pattern of genomic instability characterizes BRCA1/2-related cancers and that this pattern has implications for the biology of these cancers. Moreover, our current and previous results emphasize the interaction between phenotype and genotype in BRCA1/2-related breast cancers and that a combination of morphologic features and alterations of ERBB2, MYC, and TBX2 may better define mechanisms of tumor progression, as well as determine which patients are more likely to carry BRCA1/2 mutations.

No abstract

Sporadic cancers and familial breast cancers are characterized by an increase in genetic instability. Little is known about whether mismatch repair defects accompany this genetic instability. We investigated invasive and/or in situ breast cancers from 30 women with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations and unclassified variant BRCA1/2 alterations. Forty cases of sporadic breast cancers were also investigated, including 7 medullary carcinomas. Malignant and benign lesions were examined from all cases to better understand tumor progression. Automated immunohistochemistry, with antibodies directed against hMLH1 and hMSH2, was used to screen cases for possible mismatch repair defects. When loss of expression was noted, DNA ploidy was performed by cytomorphometry. DNA, after laser microdissection, was extracted from a majority of familial cases and their corresponding controls, and microsatellite instability analysis was performed. None of the familial or sporadic cases had loss of hMSH2 expression. All but one lesion, a DCIS arising in a deleterious BRCA2 mutation carrier, had loss of hMLH1 expression and a tetraploid profile by image cytomorphometry. There was no MSI in any explored lesions (n ‫؍‬ 34), as determined by molecular analysis, including the DCIS with loss of hMLH1 expression. We conclude that DNA mismatch repair defects involving hMLH1 and hMSH2 underexpression are extremely rare events in sporadic and familial breast cancer. Mismatch repair gene mutations may be secondary random events in breast cancer progression. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Key words: BRCA1/2; medullary carcinoma; hMLH1; hMSH2; genetic instabilityGenetic instability in the form of MIN is common in solid tumors. The MIN phenotype is often detected by the presence of MSI. Mutations in the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes, which are involved in DNA mismatch repair, can be a cause of MSI. These mutations also cause HNPCC. 1 Tumors arising in these patients have specific clinical and pathologic features, such as a better prognosis and a heavy lymphoid infiltrate. At the molecular level, these tumors also have a high frequency of MSI. Previous studies in colon cancer have shown high correlation between the presence of MSI and loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression, as determined by immunohistochemistry. 2-4 Such tumors are also usually diploid. 5,6 However, CIN characterizes aneuploid tumors with chromosomal gains and losses. 7 CIN tumors rarely exhibit MSI.While breast cancer has been excluded as one of the extracolonic cancers that contribute to the HNPCC phenotype, 8 medullary carcinomas and breast cancers from deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers share some characteristic clinical and pathologic features with the HNPCC-related cancers. They have a favorable prognosis and often a dense lymphoid infiltrate. 9 We assessed the incidence of mismatch repair gene mutations in hereditary and sporadic breast cancers, including medullary carcinomas. We hypothesized that mismatch gene repair mutations might explain these morphologic similarities. MATERIAL AND METHODS Pati...

Nearly 10% of human gliomas are oligodendrogliomas. Deletion of chromosome arm 19q, often in conjunction with deletion of 1p, has been observed in 65–80% of these tumors. This has suggested the presence of a tumor suppressor gene located on the 19q arm. Chromosome 19 deletion is also of interest due to the better prognosis of patients with deletion, including longer survival and better response to chemotherapy, compared with patients without deletion. Two glioma cell lines with deletion of 19q were used for chromosome 19 microcell-mediated transfer, to assess the effect of replacing the deleted segment. Complementation with chromosome 19 significantly reduced the growth rate of the hybrid cells compared with the parental cell lines. Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Gene Chip analysis was performed to measure and compare the expression of the chromosome 19 genes in the chromosome 19 hybrid cell lines to the parental cell line. Probes were considered significantly different when a P value <0.01 was seen in all of the cell line comparisons. Of 345 probes within the commonly deleted 19q region, seven genes (APOE, RCN3, FLJ10781, SAE1, STRN4, CCDC8, and BCL2L12) were identified as potential candidate genes. RT-PCR analysis of primary tumor specimens showed that several genes had significant differences when stratified by tumor morphology or deletion status. This suggests that one or more of these candidates may play a role in glioma formation or progression.