I (Cheryl, second author) recently observed 2 ninth-grade general English classrooms in an urban high school in which I do research. Both were print rich-walls covered with posters, charts, and artwork that referenced literature texts, content knowledge, and curriculum standards. In both classrooms, similar content was covered, including literature texts such as Monster, Who Am I Without Him? and Day of Tears.Yet, upon closer inspection, the practices in each of the spaces were different; and these practices made a difference in the levels of engagement and student performance. Though each space was print rich, the visually rich environment in one classroom was a product of the students' literacies, including studentcreated CDs of musical narratives of Monster and Who Am I Without Him?; photos and drawings/paintings and artistic renderings of literature characters, themes, and settings; poetry and lyrics from songs of protest; and Facebook pages from characters of the novels. In the room, students moved fluidly across literacy stations and book clubs, worked individually to create artifacts, and had gallery walks of their peers' published works that prompted their own reflection, commentary, discussion, and writing.Observing and participating in this particular classroom, I realized that I could see these students' worlds, their thinking, and knowledge: The texts that the students produced and interacted with demonstrated a discerning use of color, shape, spatial representation, print, message and meaning/communication, and critical knowledge of canonical and popular culture.The teacher used her students' visual literacies to help drive instruction and ground knowledge. The "visual literacy" in this ninth-grade class was not restricted to traditional graphic organizers and webs. Using this as a model, how can educators purposefully tap into our students' visual literacies in the secondary school classroom?