This systematic study will clarify the nature of QoL in survivors of pediatric TBI, and identify predictors of QoL in this group. Of 419 articles identified, 11 studies met our inclusion criteria, and 9 were ultimately analyzed in this review. Four studies reported good QoL and 5 poor QoL. The difference between good and poor QoL was statistically significant due to TBI severity [chi-square(3)=77.38, p<0.001], timing of outcome assessment [chi-square(1)=565, p<0.001], and definition of QoL [chi-square(3)=34.73, p<0.001]. The odds of having a poor QoL increased 5.8 times (RR=1.21) when injuries were more severe. Good outcomes are contingent on milder injuries, proxy reporting, and early assessment, whereas poor outcomes reflect more severe injuries and later assessment (≤ 6 months versus ≥ 1 year post-trauma, respectively).

No abstract

No abstract