PurposeWe studied the validity, usefulness, and relative cost to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR) and sight-threatening DR (STDR) by using a hand-held electrophysiologic tool compared to digital fundus photography.MethodPatients with diabetes attending the screening unit of King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia were evaluated by “RETeval”, Amsler grid, and digital dilated fundus photography. Fundus images were evaluated by a retina specialist to determine grade of DR. The sensitivity and specificity of STDR and DR screening compared to photography were calculated, as well as “RETeval” combined with Amsler grid testing. The area under the curve (AUC) of “RETeval” screening outcome was calculated.ResultWe analyzed data of 400 diabetic patients. The prevalence of DR of any grade was 48.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43.9–53.7) while the prevalence of STDR was 27% (95% CI, 22.6–31.4). The outcome of RETeval test was “fail” (based on 20 μV or more amplitude of electrophysiologic spikes) in 351 (87.8%; 95% CI, 84.5–91.0) eyes. The sensitivity of the device was 95.4% and the specificity was 17.5%. Thus, the sensitivity of sequential testing with RETeval and Amsler grid test was 30.1% and the specificity was 80.1%. The AUCs for STDR and DR in general were 76.6% and 50.6%, respectively.Conclusions“RETeval” is a rapid screening device with excellent sensitivity for detecting STDR. It has potential as a first level screening tool to detect patients who require further evaluation.Translational RelevanceRetinal function, such as electrophysiology, can be used as a new concept for screening for DR.

PURPOSE: The prevalence and determinants of dry eye disease (DED) among 40 years and older population of Riyadh (except capital), Saudi Arabia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A population-based survey was conducted in Riyadh district between 2013 and 2017. All Saudi aged >40 years attended at the Primary Health Center were the study population. McCarty Symptom Questionnaire was adopted. A representative sample was examined. The best-corrected visual acuity and anterior and posterior segment assessment were performed. DED was graded as absent, mild, moderate, and severe. RESULTS: We examined 890 participants. The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of DED was 45.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 44.8–45.4). One-third of the participants had DED. However, two-third of DED cases were of mild grade. The prevalence of DED among females was significantly higher. The variation of DED by age group was not statistically significant (χ 2 = 2.6, Degree of freedom = 3, and P = 0.1). Presence of glaucoma was significantly associated to DED (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6, [95% CI = 1.2–5.6], and P = 0.01). Use of topical glaucoma medication was significantly associated to DED (OR = 4.6 [95% CI = 1.8–11.8], and P = 0.001). However, severity of DED was not found to be associated with glaucoma medication (χ 2 = 2.6, P = 0.1). Associations of diabetes and hypertension to DED were not statistically significant (OR = 0.97 [95% CI = 0.73–1.3], and P = 0.84) (OR = 1.1 [95% CI = 0.8–1.4], and P = 0.6). The severe visual impairment was not associated to the grade of DED ( P = 0.55). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of DED among Saudi is high, but severe DED is found to be less. Association with female gender, glaucoma, and topical glaucoma medications was reported. Association with diabetes, hypertension, and age group variation was not significant.

Purpose:We present the visual outcomes 6 weeks following Femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification cataract extraction (CE) cataract surgeries in 2013.Materials and Methods:This was a review of health record type of study. Eyes operated by FLACS and an equal number of conventional phacoemulsification (CE) on the same day by same surgeon were included in the study. Demographics, preoperative status, operative details and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6–8 weeks following surgery were noted. BCVA of >20/60 was considered as excellent. The rate and determinants of excellent vision were calculated.Result:Study population comprised of 154 eyes. Both FLACS and CL groups had 77 eyes. Visual acuity at 6–8 weeks was excellent in 44 (60%) eyes of FLACS group and 36 (40%) eyes of CE. Visual outcome following FLACS and conventional surgery was not different (Odd's ratio [OR] 1.5 [95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.8–2.9]). Operating surgeon did not significantly influence the visual outcomes following FLACS (OR = 1.6) and CE (OR = 0.4). Association of the grade of lens opacities to the visual outcome was not affected by type of surgery (χ2 = 0.5, P = 0.2). The duration of surgery in CE and FLACS groups was not significantly different (−3.2 min [95% CI: −13; 6.6]).Conclusion:Visual outcomes at 6–8 weeks following CE were not different from FLACS. Visual outcomes following FLACS and CE were not influenced by the operating surgeon or severity of the cataract. The time required for FLACS was greater than that required for CE.

No abstract

No abstract