The 8 edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage classification (TNM) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) was launched. It remains unknown if incorporation of non-anatomic factors into the stage classification would better predict survival. We prospectively recruited 518 patients with non-metastatic NPC treated with radical IMRT +/- chemotherapy based on the 8 edition TNM. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) incorporating pretreatment plasma EBV DNA derived new stage groups. Multivariable analyses to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) derived another set of stage groups. 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were: stage I (PFS 100%, OS 90%, CSS 100%), II (PFS 88%, OS 84%, CSS 95%), III (PFS 84%, OS 84%, CSS 90%) and IVA (PFS 71%, OS 75%, CSS 80%) (p < 0.001, p = 0.066, and p = 0.002 respectively). RPA derived 4 new stages: RPA-I (T1-T4N0-N2 & EBV DNA <500 copies/ml) (PFS 94%, OS 89%, CSS 96%), RPA-II (T1-T4N0-N2 & EBV DNA ≥500 copies/ml) (PFS 80%, OS 83%, CSS 89%), RPA-III (T1-T2N3) (PFS 64%, OS 83%, CSS 83%) and RPA-IVA (T3-T4N3) (PFS 63%, OS 60% and CSS 68%) (all with p < 0.001). AHR using covariate adjustment also yielded a valid classification (I: T1-T2N0-N2; II: T3-T4N0-N2 or T1-T2N3, and III: T3-T4N3) (all with p < 0.001). However, RPA stages better predicted survival for PS and CSS after bootstrapping replications. Our RPA-based stage groups revealed better survival prediction compared to the 8 edition TNM and the AHR stage groups. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Background
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in endemic regions may have undetectable plasma EBV DNA.
Methods
We prospectively recruited 518 patients with non-metastatic NPC and measured their pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA. The stage distribution and prognosis between pre-treatment plasma EBV DNA-negative (0–20 copies/ml) and EBV DNA-positive (>20 copies/ml) patients following radical treatment were compared.
Results
Seventy-eight patients (15.1%) were plasma EBV DNA-negative, and 62 in this subset (12.0%) had 0 copy/ml. Only 23/78 (29.5%) plasma EBV DNA-negative patients with advanced NPC (stage III-IVA) had strong EBV encoded RNA (EBER) positivity (score 3) in their tumours compared to 342/440 (77.7%) EBV DNA-positive patients of the same stages (p < 0.001). Though EBV DNA-negative patients had more early-stage disease (p < 0.001) and smaller volumes of the primary tumour and the positive neck nodes (p < 0.001), they had similar 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival to those EBV DNA-positive counterparts by stage. Similar results were also seen when plasma EBV DNA cut-off was set at 0 copy/ml.
Conclusions
Patients with low-volume NPC may not be identified by plasma/serum tumour markers and caution should be taken in its utility as a screening tool for NPC even in endemic regions.
Clinical trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02476669.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.