For surgical treatment of big BPE, bipolar endoscopic enucleation of prostate provided superior functional outcome than bipolar resection but required longer operative time.

The ambulatory care program reduced the hospital admission rate and reduced cost without jeopardizing the TWOC success rate and safety in the management of patients presenting with AUR.

We observed a predilection of this tumour to be locally aggressive, and hence a relatively high incidence of intra-luminal growth and rectal invasion. We observed a high failure rate after either radical prostatectomy or hormonal therapy.

Both 120 and 180 W Greenlight lasers produced deeper HDZ than the other energy sources. Urologists need to be aware of HDZ that cause tissue damage outside the operative field.

Large benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) has been a major health problem and the surgical management could be technically challenging to urologists due to the limitation of conventional monopolar transurethral resection of prostate. Bipolar endoscopic enucleation of prostate aimed to remove the adenoma of BPE by stepwise adenoma devascularization and maximal adenoma removal through minimally invasive surgery. In this chapter we described the general principle, the surgical techniques of bipolar endoscopic enucleation and the related modifications of the technique in the recent years. As compared with open prostatectomy, bipolar endoscopic enucleation avoided the wound complications but achieved similar functional outcome. Bipolar endoscopic enucleation also allowed much more adenoma removal comparing with transurethral resection of the prostate. Unlike Holmium laser or thulium laser enucleation of the prostate, the required instruments for bipolar endoscopic enucleation of the prostate were familiar and more readily available to most urologists.