Summary Various techniques have been explored to prolong the duration and improve the efficacy of local anaesthetic nerve blocks. Some of these involve mixing local anaesthetics or adding adjuncts. We did a literature review of studies published between 01 May 2011 and 01 May 2021 that studied specific combinations of local anaesthetics and adjuncts. The rationale behind mixing long‐ and short‐acting local anaesthetics to hasten onset and extend duration is flawed on pharmacokinetic principles. Most local anaesthetic adjuncts are not licensed for use in this manner and the consequences of untested admixtures and adjuncts range from making the solution ineffective to potential harm. Pharmaceutical compatibility needs to be established before administration. The compatibility of drugs from the same class cannot be inferred and each admixture requires individual review. Precipitation on mixing (steroids, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs) and subsequent embolisation can lead to serious adverse events, although these are rare. The additive itself or its preservative can have neurotoxic (adrenaline, midazolam) and/or chondrotoxic properties (non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs). The prolongation of block may occur at the expense of motor block quality (ketamine) or block onset (magnesium). Adverse effects for some adjuncts appear to be dose‐dependent and recommendations concerning optimal dosing are lacking. An important confounding factor is whether studies used systemic administration of the adjunct as a control to accurately identify an additional benefit of perineural administration. The challenge of how best to prolong block duration while minimising adverse events remains a topic of interest with further research required.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction: We investigated the safety and efficacy of PEG-BCT-100 in combination with oxaliplatin and capecitabine (PACOX) in advanced HCC patients.Methods: This was a single centre phase 1 trial to assess the safety and tolerability of PACOX. All the enrolled subjects received treatment in 3-weekly cycles: IV PEG-BCT-100 2.7 mg/kg on day 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle; oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on day 1-14 of each cycle and IV oxaliplatin on day 1. Three dose levels of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, 100 mg/m2 or 130 mg/m2) were studied to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Adverse events (AEs), efficacy by RECIST v1.1, time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were studied.Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled at 3 doses of oxaliplatin: 85 mg/m2 (8 patients), 100 mg/m2 (3 patients), and 130 mg/m2 (6 patients). The median age was 55 years; all had local-regional chemotherapy or target therapy such as sorafenib, but no systemic chemotherapy. Most common AEs were nausea (82%), injection site reaction (76%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (59%), oral mucositis (53%) and vomiting (53%). There was no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Median duration on study was 8 weeks overall. In 14 evaluable cases, one achieved partial response (PR), 4 had stable disease (SD); disease control rate was 36% (5/14); most responses were observed in the 130 mg/m2 cohort with 1 PR and 2 SDs (3/6 or 50%). The median TTP, PFS were both 7.0 weeks. Overall median OS was 10.7 months; the median OS was not reached at 19.4 months of follow-up in the third cohort.Conclusion: The PACOX regimen demonstrated good anti-cancer activity and survival advantage in advanced pre-treated HCC with favourable safety profile. It warrants further phase II/III studies.

No abstract