AIMTo evaluate the angiogenic effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-preconditioned adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) both in vitro and in a mouse ischemic hindlimb model.METHODSADSCs were divided based on culture medium: 2.5% PRP, 5% PRP, 7.5% PRP, and 10% PRP. Cell proliferation rate was analyzed using the MTS assay. The gene expression of CD31, vascular endothelial growth factor, hypoxia-inducible factors, and endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase was analyzed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Cell markers and structural changes were assessed through immunofluorescence staining and the tube formation assay. Subsequently, we studied the in vivo angiogenic capabilities of ADSCs by a mouse ischemic hindlimb model.RESULTSThe proliferation rate of ADSCs was higher in the 2.5%, 5%, and 7.5% PRP groups. The expression of hypoxia-inducible factor, CD31, vascular endothelial growth factor, and endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase in the 5% and 7.5% PRP groups increased. The 5%, 7.5%, and 10% PRP groups showed higher abilities to promote both CD31 and vascular endothelial growth factor production and tubular structure formation in ADSCs. According to laser Doppler perfusion scan, the perfusion ratios of ischemic limb to normal limb were significantly higher in 5% PRP, 7.5% PRP, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells groups compared with the negative control and fetal bovine serum (FBS) groups (0.88 ± 0.08, 0.85 ± 0.07 and 0.81 ± 0.06 for 5%, 7.5% PRP and human umbilical vein endothelial cells compared with 0.42 ± 0.17 and 0.54 ± 0.14 for the negative control and FBS, P < 0.01).CONCLUSIONPRP-preconditioned ADSCs presented endothelial cell characteristics in vitro and significantly improved neovascularization in ischemic hindlimbs. The optimal angiogenic effect occurred in 5% PRP- and 7.5% PRP-preconditioned ADSCs.
Background: The ability to simultaneously cut and perform hemostasis with low lateral thermal injury makes carbon dioxide laser a useful tool in blepharoplasty. Monopolar electrosurgery is another commonly used cutting tool that improves the quality of hemostasis and cutting speed. This study aimed to objectively and quantitatively assess the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty using either a carbon dioxide laser or monopolar electrosurgery. Methods: Between August of 2018 and March of 2021, 78 patients who underwent transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty were assigned randomly to the carbon dioxide laser group or the monopolar electrosurgery group. Patient-related parameters were recorded. Periorbital bruises were assessed objectively and quantitatively using the ecchymosis evaluation score. Analyses were performed using the independent sample t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, the chi-square test, and the Fisher exact test. Results: Sex, age, local anesthesia injection volume, and fat removal volume were not different between the groups. Patients’ subjective intraoperative heat sensation was significantly higher in the monopolar electrosurgery group than in the carbon dioxide laser group. The carbon dioxide laser group had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative chemosis than the monopolar electrosurgery group. All patients had uncomplicated wound healing, except three (7.89%) patients in the monopolar electrosurgery group who developed conjunctival granuloma. Operation time, intraoperative pain sensation, intraoperative blood pressure, postoperative ecchymosis, conjunctivitis, and patients’ aesthetic satisfaction did not differ between the groups. Conclusion: The authors’ findings revealed that carbon dioxide laser is a useful technique for reducing intraoperative heat sensation and postoperative chemosis and may prevent conjunctival wound complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.
Background This study aimed to propose a novel four-type deformity and treatment-oriented classification of the lower eyelids that directs the therapeutic combination of threestep lower blepharoplasty for Asian populations. Methods We reviewed 183 patients who underwent a therapeutic combination of three steps of lower blepharoplasty after being diagnosed with four types of lower eyelid deformities between July 2018 and April 2021. The threestep lower blepharoplasty includes: (1) mid-face and lower eyelid augmentation, (2) transconjunctival eye bag removal, and (3) skin pinch removal. Consecutive digital images, detailed fat graft volume, fat removal amount, skin pinch removal amount, complications, and patient's satisfaction and aesthetic improvement score were recorded. Results The overall patient's satisfy score is 91. Aesthetic improvement score is 80.2 and 83.3 among lay persons and experts, respectively. The volume of the fat graft ranges from 2 to 3 mL per orbit according to the severity of the deformity. The amount of fat removed was 0.53 ± 0.36 and 0.61 ± 0.40 mL per orbit in types II and III patients, respectively. There is no lower lid malposition. Eleven patients had over-correction of fat grafting, and they need steroid injection; 20 patients had under-correction of fat grafting, and they need secondary fat grafting. Ten patients need secondary skin pinch excision due to post-op skin redundancy. Two patients had conjunctiva wound granuloma. Conclusions The combination of three-step lower blepharoplasty according to the novel classification is a straightforward and effective method to correct lower eyelid deformities. The complication rate was low with high patient satisfaction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.