Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (ES/PNET) is an aggressive bone tumor. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB) has been recognized as the gold standard for assessing bone marrow status. While the latest guideline suggests the need to omit bone marrow aspiration in patients with no findings on 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET) based on one retrospective report, there is no study using 18 F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT). We retrospectively reviewed 26 consecutive, previously untreated, ES/PNET patients. We compare the results of bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB) and those of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in ES/PNET patients. All of the 21 patients without metastases on 18 F-FDG PET/CT had negative BMAB. The sensitivity of bone marrow involvement in bone metastases positive patients on 18 F-FDG PET/CT was 75% (3/4), and the specificity was 100% (22/22). In addition to the metastatic findings on 18 F-FDG PET/CT, tumor diameter, lactate dehydrogenase level at diagnosis, and the presence or absence of bone metastasis were factors related to bone marrow involvement. It may be a reasonable option to omit BMAB in ES/PNET patients with no distant metastasis based on 18 F-FDG PET/CT findings.

BackgroundOccurrence of metastatic cancer to the stomach is rare, particularly in patients with prostate cancer. Gastric metastasis generally presents as a solitary and submucosal lesion with a central depression.Case presentationWe describe a case of gastric metastasis arising from prostate cancer, which is almost indistinguishable from the undifferentiated-type gastric cancer. A definitive diagnosis was not made until endoscopic resection. On performing both conventional and magnifying endoscopies, the lesion appeared to be slightly depressed and discolored area and it could not be distinguished from undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Biopsy from the lesion was negative for immunohistochemical staining of prostate-specific antigen, a sensitive and specific marker for prostate cancer. Thus, false initial diagnosis of an early primary gastric cancer was made and endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed. Pathological findings from the resected specimen aroused suspicion of a metastatic lesion. Consequently, immunostaining was performed. The lesion was positive for prostate-specific acid phosphatase and negative for prostate-specific antigen, cytokeratin 7, and cytokeratin 20. Accordingly, the final diagnosis was a metastatic gastric lesion originating from prostate cancer.ConclusionIn this patient, the definitive diagnosis as a metastatic lesion was difficult due to its unusual endoscopic appearance and the negative stain for prostate-specific antigen. We postulate that both of these are consequences of hormonal therapy against prostate cancer.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay is part of routine care in Japan owing to its reimbursement by Japan’s universal health-care system; however, reimbursement is limited to patients who finished standard treatment. We retrospectively investigated 221 patients who underwent Foundation One CDX (F1CDx) at our hospital. Every F1CDx result was assessed at the molecular tumor board (MTB) for treatment recommendation. Based on patients’ preferences, presumed germline findings were also assessed at the MTB and disclosed at the clinic. In total, 204 patients underwent F1CDx and 195 patients completed the analysis; however, 13.8% of them could not receive the report due to disease progression. Among 168 patients who received the results, 41.6% had at least one actionable alteration, and 3.6% received genomically matched treatment. Presumed germline findings were nominated in 24 patients, and 16.7% of them contacted a geneticist counselor. The NGS assay should be performed earlier in the clinical course to maximize the clinical benefit. Broader reimbursement for the NGS assay would enhance the delivery of precision oncology to patients. Access to clinical trials affects the number of patients who benefit from NGS. Additionally, the disclosure of presumed germline findings is feasible in clinical practice.

No abstract

Eribulin mesylate (eribulin) is a nontaxane microtubule inhibitor approved in Japan for treating soft tissue sarcoma irrespective of histological subtypes. Thus, our department routinely uses eribulin to treat any histological subtype of sarcoma for patients who have experienced disease progression during standard therapy. However, evidence on the efficacy of eribulin in treating sarcomas that are neither liposarcoma nor leiomyosarcoma is limited. Recently, we encountered a case of a heavily pretreated cardiac angiosarcoma that responded well to eribulin treatment. The patient was a 34-year-old Japanese woman with advanced angiosarcoma, who had been pretreated heavily using several lines of chemotherapy. Eribulin was administered as the eighth line of treatment and the dose was adjusted because of grade 4 neutropenia. After three cycles of treatment, contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a partial tumor response, which was sustained for ~4 months. This case suggests that eribulin may be a potential therapeutic option for angiosarcoma. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefit of eribulin for patients with angiosarcoma and to establish predictive markers for eribulin sensitivity.