No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundThere was no available data concerning the clinical differentiation between the updated definition of early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) and anti-acid therapy-resistant functional dyspepsia (RFD).AimsWe aimed to determine whether clinical symptoms, gastric motility, psychogenic factors and fat intake can help distinguish early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) from anti-acid therapy-resistant functional dyspepsia patients with pancreatic enzyme abnormalities (RFD-P) and anti-acid therapy-resistant functional dyspepsia (RFD) patients using endosonography.MethodsWe enrolled 102 consecutive patients presenting with typical symptoms of RFD patients (n = 52), ECP patients (n = 25) and RFD-P patients (n = 25). ECP patients were diagnosed based on the criteria recommended by the Japan Pancreatic Association. Gastric motility was evaluated by 13C-acetate breath tests. Severity of duodenal inflammation was examined.Results24.5% of RFD patients were determined as ECP using endosonography. Abdominal pain score in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) in the patients with ECP was significantly lower compared to that in the patients with RFD-P. There were no significant differences in State-Trait Inventory (STAI)-state/-trait scores, Self-Rating Questionnaire for Depression (SRQ-D) scores and clinical symptoms for fat intake among three groups. The early phase of gastric emptying (AUC5; AUC15) in ECP and RFD-P patients were significantly disturbed compared to those in RFD patients.ConclusionsEvaluation of severity of abdominal pain and measurement of the early phase of gastric emptying will be useful tools to distinguish ECP patients from RFD patients. Accurate diagnosis of ECP patients may contribute to the prevention from advancing of chronic pancreatitis.

Background/Aims: The aims of the study are to clarify the pathophysiological differences among early chronic pancreatitis (ECP), functional dyspepsia with pancreatic (FD-P) enzyme abnormalities and FD patients and to determine whether camostat mesilate, pancrelipase, and rabeprazole triple therapy improve FD symptoms in the ECP patients and FD-P patients in cross-over way. Methods: We enrolled 84 consecutive patients presenting with typical symptoms of FD patients (n = 42), ECP patients (n = 15), and FD-P patients (n = 27). Gastric emptying was assessed by the ¹³C-acetate breath test. ECP was diagnosed based on the criteria recommended by the Japan Pancreatic Association. Results: The proportions of female in ECP patients and FD-P were significantly higher compared to that in FD patients. The early phase of gastric emptying in ECP and FD-P patients was significantly disturbed compared to that in FD patients. The primary outcome of this study is that 4 weeks of camostat mesilate, pancrelipase, and rabeprazole triple therapy significantly ameliorated epigastric pain in ECP patients compared to acotiamide and rabeprazole combination therapy. Conclusion: Although there were no significant differences in pathophysiology between ECP patients and FD-P patients, triple therapy can significantly ameliorate epigastric pain in ECP patients. Further studies will be needed to clarify why triple therapy can improve epigastric pain in ECP patients.