Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after CEA and CAS occurs with delayed classic and acute presentations, respectively. Although strict control of postoperative blood pressure prevents intracranial hemorrhage in patients with CHS after CEA, there appears to be no relationship between blood pressure control and intracranial hemorrhage in those with CHS after CAS. Finally, the prognosis of CHS in patients with associated intracerebral hemorrhage is poor.
The goal of this clinical trial was to assess the feasibility and safety of transplanting autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells into patients suffering severe embolic stroke. Major inclusion criteria included patients with cerebral embolism, age 20–75 years, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score displaying improvement of ≤5 points during the first 7 days after stroke, and NIHSS score of ≥10 on day 7 after stroke. Bone marrow aspiration (25 or 50 mL; N = 6 patients in each case) was performed 7–10 days poststroke, and bone marrow mononuclear cells were administrated intravenously. Mean total transplanted cell numbers were 2.5 × 108 and 3.4 × 108 cells in the lower and higher dose groups, respectively. No apparent adverse effects of administering bone marrow cells were observed. Compared with the lower dose, patients receiving the higher dose of bone marrow cells displayed a trend toward improved neurologic outcomes. Compared with 1 month after treatment, patients receiving cell therapy displayed a trend toward improved cerebral blood flow and metabolic rate of oxygen consumption 6 months after treatment. In comparison with historical controls, patients receiving cell therapy had significantly better neurologic outcomes. Our results indicated that intravenous transplantation of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells is safe and feasible. Positive results and trends favoring neurologic recovery and improvement in cerebral blood flow and metabolism by cell therapy underscore the relevance of larger scale randomized controlled trials using this approach.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Paraclinoid aneurysms have been increasingly treated endovascularly. The natural history of these aneurysms has gradually been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for these aneurysms.
Background and Purpose—
National registration studies (the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy [JR-NET] and JR-NET2) have determined the current status and outcomes of neuroendovascular therapy (neuro-EVT). We analyzed short-term outcomes of EVT for asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs).
Methods—
We extracted periprocedural information about EVT for 4767 asymptomatic UIAs from 31 968 registered procedural records of all EVT in the JR-NET and JR-NET2 databases. We assessed the features of the aneurysms and procedures, immediate radiographic findings, procedure-related complications, and clinical outcomes at 30 days after the procedures.
Results—
We located 80.0% of UIAs in the anterior circulation, and the most frequent were paraclinoid. The diameter of 2.5%, 32.9%, 51.9%, 12.0%, and 0.7% of the UIAs was <3, 3 to 4, 5 to 9, 10 to 19, and >20 mm, respectively. EVT failed in only 2.1%. Adjunctive techniques were applied in 54.8% of procedures. Pre- and postprocedural antiplatelet agents were prescribed in 85.6% and 84.0%, respectively, of the procedures. The immediate radiographic outcomes of 57.7%, 31.9%, and 10.0% of the UIAs comprised complete occlusion, residual necks, and residual aneurysms, respectively. Complications that were associated with 9.1% of procedures comprised 2.0% hemorrhagic and 4.6% ischemic, and the 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 2.12% and 0.31%, respectively.
Conclusions—
The radiographic results of EVT for asymptomatic UIAs in Japan were acceptable, with low mortality and morbidity rates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.