Background. 99mTc-HMDP scintigraphy has proved its efficacy in non-invasive diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and is currently interpreted according to the Perugini qualitative assessment. Several semi-quantitative indices have been proposed to overcome inherent possible limitations of visual grading. Our aim was to comparatively evaluate six different indices and their diagnostic performance. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed scintigraphy of 76 patients (53 ATTR, 12 AL, 11 LVH) who underwent diagnostic evaluation at our centre. ROC-curve analysis was performed to identify optimal cutoff and relative diagnostic accuracy of six different indices (of which one was proposed for the first time), both in identifying CA patients and in discriminating patients according to their Perugini score. Results. Heart/Whole-body ratios proved to be the most accurate (100%) in identifying CA patients. Heart/Pelvis ratio (with soft tissue background correction) offered acceptable accuracy (98%), with the largest area under the curve (AUC) (0.98) in discriminating patients with Perugini ‡ 2. Heart/Contralateral Lung ratio confirmed to be exposed to confounding background noise in case of simultaneous lung uptake. Heart/Skull ratio had the worst performance, with six false-negative patients in ATTR identification. Conclusion. Heart/Whole-body ratios may be robust and effective semi-quantitative indices for the evaluation of CA by means of scintigraphy (J Nucl Cardiol 2019
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.