The inv(16)(p13q22) chromosomal rearrangement associated with FAB M4Eo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtype is characterized by the presence of the CBFbeta/MYH11 fusion transcript that can be used to detect minimal residual disease (MRD). However, qualitative RT-PCR studies of MRD have so far produced conflicting results and seem of limited prognostic value. We have evaluated retrospectively MRD in a large series of CBFbeta/MYH11-positive patients employing both qualitative and quantitative (real-time PCR) approaches. 186 bone marrow samples from 36 patients were examined with a median followup of 27.5 months; 15 patients relapsed during follow-up. In qualitative studies, carried out by 'nested' RT-PCR assay, all patients in complete remission (CR) immediately after induction/consolidation therapy were found to be PCR positive. However, follow-up samples at later time points were persistently negative (except one case) in patients remaining in continuous CR (CCR) for more than 12 months. 16 patients were evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR assay: CBFbeta/MYH11 transcript copy number was normalized for expression of the housekeeping gene ABL, expressed as fusion gene copy number per 10 4 copies of ABL. A 2-3 log decline in leukemic transcript copy number was observed after induction/consolidation therapy. After achieving CR, the mean copy number was significantly higher in patients destined to relapse compared to patients remaining in CCR (151 vs 9, P Ͻ 0.0001 by Mann-Whitney test). Moreover, in CCR patients, the copy number dropped below the detection threshold after the treatment protocol was completed and remained undetectable in subsequent MRD analysis in accordance with results obtained by qualitative RT-PCR. On the contrary, in the seven patients who relapsed, the copy number in CR never declined below the detection threshold; thus a cut-off value discriminating these two groups of patients could be established. The findings of our study, if confirmed, might confer an important predictive value to quantitative real-time PCR determinations of MRD in patients with inv(16) leukemia.

Summary This study describes the outcome of patients receiving haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to treat severe refractory autoimmune cytopenia. The registry of the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation holds data on 36 patients receiving 38 transplants, the first transplant was autologous for 27 and allogeneic for nine patients. Patients had autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (autologous: 5; allogeneic: 2), Evans's syndrome (autologous: 2; allogeneic: 5); immune thrombocytopenia (autologous: 12), pure red cell aplasia (autologous: 4; allogeneic: 1), pure white cell aplasia (autologous: 1; allogeneic 1), or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (autologous: 3). Patients had longstanding disease having failed multiple prior treatments. Among 26 evaluable patients mobilized for autologous HSCT, three died of treatment‐related causes, one died of disease progression, seven were non‐responders, six patients had transient responses and nine had continuous partial or complete remission. Of the seven evaluable patients receiving allogeneic HSCT, one died of treatment‐related complications, one with transient response died of progressive disease and five had a continuous response. Autologous and allogeneic HSCT may induce a response in a subset of patients with autoimmune cytopenia of long duration albeit at the price of considerable toxicity.

BACKGROUNDThe authors investigated the efficacy and safety of the histone deacetylase inhibitors valproic acid (VPA) and all‐trans retinoic acid (ATRA) as differentiation agents in a cohort of older, poor‐risk patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).METHODSTwenty older patients with recurrent or refractory AML or MDS were treated in a Phase II protocol with sequential VPA and ATRA therapy. VPA was started at a dose of 10 mg/kg per day and then escalated to achieve the serum concentration of 45–100 μg/mL. ATRA was added at 45 mg/square meters (sm) per day when VPA reached the target serum concentration. Only patients treated continuously for ≥ 2 months were considered evaluable.RESULTSHematologic improvement, according to World Health Organization criteria, was observed in 6 of 20 patients enrolled in the protocol but in 6 of 11 considered evaluable. In five patients, a major platelet response was observed, achieving platelet transfusion independence. Three of these five patients also exhibited a minor erythroid response. A sixth patient showed both a minor erythroid response and a platelet response. The median duration of response was 189 days (range, 63–550 days). No significant reduction in the blast count was observed. Grade 3 neurocortical toxicity was observed in four patients. Severe bone pain was experienced by 4 patients (2 Grade 4 and 2 Grade 3) and was associated with an increase in the peripheral blast cell count. Treatment with ATRA did not modify the response observed with VPA alone.CONCLUSIONSDifferentiation therapy with VPA was of clinical benefit in approximately 30% of elderly patients with AML and MDS of the refractory anemia with excess of blast type with unfavorable prognostic features. A striking platelet transfusion independence lasting several months may be obtained in some patients, reducing the burden of palliative care and improving the quality of life. Cancer 2005;. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUNDThe objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the clinically available histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor valproate to enhance the cytotoxicity of the Bcr‐Abl inhibitor imatinib in imatinib‐resistant cell lines.METHODSInteractions between imatinib, and valproate have been examined in imatinib‐sensitive and ‐resistant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)cell lines (K562, KCL‐22, CML‐T1) and in bone marrow mononuclear cells (MNCs) derived from imatinib‐resistant CML patients.RESULTSIn imatinib‐sensitive cell lines, cotreatment with imatinib 0.5 μM and valproate 5 μM for 48 hours potently enhanced imatinib‐induced growth arrest and apoptosis. In resistant cell lines and in primary MNCs derived from imatinib‐resistant patients, valproate restored sensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of imatinib. Coexposure of cells to valproate and imatinib was associated with repression of several genes involved in Bcr‐Abl transformation. In particular, the combination valproate–imatinib downregulated the expression of Bcr‐Abl and the antiapoptotic protein Bcl‐2, which is particularly overexpressed in imatinib‐resistant clones.CONCLUSIONSData from this study suggested that administration of the clinically available HDAC inhibitor valproate may be a powerful strategy to enhance cytotoxic effects of imatinib in those patient resistant to imatinib or in which complete cytogenetic remission has been not reached. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.