While hearing aids are recommended for people with age-related hearing loss, many with impaired hearing do not use them. In this study, we investigated how many elderly people in the study area needed hearing aids, and the factors that determined continued wearing of the devices. The study area was Kurabuchi Town, Japan, where 1,437 residents (those aged 65 years or over) were eligible for participation in the study; 1,414 participated, of whom, 103 (7.3%) were already using hearing aids at the start of the study. After the primary screening, hearing aids were lent to 68 participants (4.8%) who did not already have one, 38 of whom (60.3% of the borrowers, representing 2.7% of the total aged population) went on to wear the hearing aid continuously. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) score was significantly elevated among these 38 participants. This study indicated that hearing aids are of potential benefit to many local residents. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that HHIE scores were associated with the extent of HA usage. The adjusted odds ratio for a 1-unit increase in HHIE score was 1.08 (95% confidence interval: 1.02–1.14). Programs like this, in which people with impaired hearing are identified at the local level and given appropriate assistance, are useful models for future use in societies with aging populations.

Of the 25 ears lacking any malformation, 21, three, and one showed 'Good', 'Variable', and 'No' ECAP responses, respectively, and 24 and one showed 'Good' and 'Variable' intra-cochlear responses, respectively. Of the 15 ears with a malformation, two showed 'Good' ECAP responses, nine had 'Variable' ECAP responses, and four showed 'No' ECAP responses. Moreover, five showed 'Good' EABR responses and 10 showed 'Variable' EABR responses.

ObjectivesWe sought to determine how the pathology altered electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) in patients with hearing loss by evaluating EABRs in auditory neuropathy patients with OTOF mutations comparing with various types of congenital deafness.MethodsWe included 15 patients with congenital hearing loss, grouped according to pathology: OTOF mutations (n = 4), GJB2 mutations (n = 4), SLC26A4 mutations (n = 4), or cytomegalovirus infections (n = 3). EABRs were recorded when patients underwent cochlear implantation surgery. We evaluated the latencies and amplitudes of the recorded EABRs and compared them statistically between four groups.ResultsThe EABR latencies of Wave III and Wave V, and of the interval between them, were significantly longer in the OTOF mutation group than in the GJB2 and SLC26A4 mutation groups (Wave III) and in all three other groups (Wave V and Wave III‐V latency); amplitudes were not significantly different between groups.ConclusionsOur results suggest OTOF mutations cause delayed (or slowed) postsynaptic neurotransmission, although the presumed mechanism involved reduced presynaptic transmission between hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons.Level of EvidenceMainly a case report

The neurological test revealed system loss of somatosensory sensation with normal motor function and articulation ability. Brain imaging revealed extensive infarction in the bilateral primary auditory cortices, postcentral gyruses, and the bilateral partial third frontal gyruses. Pure-tone audiometry of both ears revealed off-the-scale results and speech audiometry demonstrated 0% maximum speech discrimination. However, objective audiometry showed normal distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) and normal auditory brainstem response (ABR). The patient showed 0% perception of environmental, speech, and music sounds in both ears. He was unable to feel vestibular sensation despite normal caloric nystagmus. He showed no damage to his larynx or articulation organs.

Objective: To propose a simple grading of inner ear malformation (IEM) and investigate intracochlear electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR) and outcomes for hearing in terms of the novel grading system. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Sixty patients with IEMs who received cochlear implants. Intervention: Grading according to observation of modiolus deficiency and/or internal auditory canal (IAC) cochlear nerve deficiency (CND). Main Outcome Measure: Intracochlear EABR and categories of auditory performance (CAP) scores were assessed; children in school were categorized according to the type of school attended. Results: Among 60 patients, 38% were classified as Grade I (modiolus present + normal cochlear nerve), 22% as grade II (modiolus deficiency + normal cochlear nerve), 33% as grade III (modiolus present + IAC CND), and 7% as grade IV (modiolus deficiency + IAC CND). During the operation, 93% of Grade I, 36% of Grade II, 23% of Grade III, and 50% of Grade IV patients showed typical EABR waves. CAP scores of 4 or more were obtained from 91% of Grade I, 62% of Grade II, 35% of Grade III, and 25% of Grade IV. Whereas none of children in Grades III and IV entered main stream school, 55% of Grade I and 25% of Grade II entered mainstream schools. Conclusions: Outcomes of hearing with cochlear implantations in IEM children depend on the severity of IEM and IAC CND. Our novel grading of IEM is simple and can be useful for understanding the severity of IEM.