In this study, the 2.5 km Cloud-Resolving Storm Simulator was applied to forecast the rainfall by three landfalling typhoons in the Philippines at high resolution: Mangkhut (2018), Koppu (2015), and Melor (2015), using a time-lagged strategy for ensemble. The three typhoons penetrated northern Luzon, central Luzon, and the middle of the Philippine Archipelago, respectively, and the present study verified the track and quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) using categorical statistics against observations at 56 rain-gauge sites at seven thresholds up to 500 mm. The predictability of rainfall is the highest for Koppu, followed by Melor, and the lowest for Mangkhut, which had the highest peak rainfall amount. Targeted at the most-rainy 24 h of each case, the threat score (TS) within the short range (≤72 h) could reach 1.0 for Koppu at 350 mm in many runs (peak observation = 502 mm), and 1.0 for Mangkhut and 0.25 for Melor (peak observation = 407 mm) both at 200 mm in the best member, when the track errors were small enough. For rainfall from entire events (48 or 72 h), TS hitting 1.0 could also be achieved regularly at 500 mm for Koppu (peak observation = 695 mm), and 0.33 at 350 mm for Melor (407 mm) and 0.46 at 200 mm for Mangkhut (786 mm) in the best case. At lead times beyond the short range, one third of these earlier runs also produced good QPFs for both Koppu and Melor, but such runs were fewer for Mangkhut and the quality of QPFs was also not as high due to larger northward track biases. Overall, the QPF results are very encouraging, and comparable to the skill level for typhoon rainfall in Taiwan (with similar peak rainfall amounts). Thus, at high resolution, there is a fair chance to make decent QPFs even at lead times of 3–7 days before typhoon landfall in the Philippines, with useful information on rainfall scenarios for early preparation.

In this study, high-resolution quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) in lagged runs with a cloud-resolving model are evaluated for three typhoons in the Philippines: Mangkhut (2018), Koppu (2015), and Melor (2015), hitting northern Luzon, central Luzon, and the middle section of the Philippine archipelago, respectively. In Part I of this study, the QPFs were verified using 56 gauge observations on land over the Philippines. Here, in Part II, they are verified against the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite estimates (also covering nearby oceans), using categorical scores in the same way. For each typhoon, rainfall valid at a selected 24 h period and the whole event (48 or 72 h) is examined. For 24 h rainfall inside the short range (lead time ≤ 72 h), good QPFs (with a threat score of ≥0.2) were produced for Koppu at 200 mm by almost all runs, and at 100 mm by all runs for Mangkhut, but only 22% of the runs for Melor. At longer lead times, good QPFs at 100 mm were also produced by all runs for Koppu, half of the runs for Mangkhut, and only 1 out of 16 runs for Melor. For whole events (48 or 72 h), the QPFs were similarly the best for Koppu, followed by Mangkhut, and least ideal for Melor. The quality of the GPM data during the three typhoons was found to be generally good and suitable for QPF verification, and the results were more stable and, thus, more reliable for the assessment of bias. However, the threat scores using the GPM dropped lower at high thresholds, and the results could become different from those obtained against the gauges (Part I), suggesting a much higher skill. Thus, verification using rain gauges is still needed toward high thresholds, especially over mountain regions where satellite estimates tend to exhibit larger errors.