No abstract

No abstract

IDDF2021-ABS-0070 Table 1). The median follow-up time was 37.5±1.2 months for HAP A, 40.8±2.9 months for HAP B, 24.0±2.5 months for HAP C and 20.4±4.1 months for HAP D. There were no deaths at the first year in HAP A. The cumulative proportion surviving at first years for HAP B, C, D was 97.4; 77.9 and 66.7, respectively. At 36 months, this percentage for HAP A, B, C and D was 92.3; 72.5; 31.1 and 27.1, respectively, (IDDF2021-ABS-0070 Table 2). Survival of all subgroups differed significantly from each other (each p < 0.05) (IDDF2021-ABS-0070 Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curve for HAP score). Area under the curve for receiver operating characteristic of HAP score was 0.71 and higher than this of ALBI grade (0.57) (IDDF2021-ABS-0070 Figure 3. ROC curves for HAP score and ALBI grade), indicating a significant performance of HAP score compared with ALBI grade in prognosis of HCC treated with TACE. Conclusions HAP is a useful score to assist for the management decisions of patients with HCC requiring TACE due to its value in predicting mortality and survival.

No abstract