The carcinoembryonic antigen glypican-3 (GPC3) is a good target of anticancer immunotherapy against pediatric solid tumors expressing GPC3. In this non-randomized, open-label, phase I clinical trial, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of GPC3-peptide vaccination in patients with pediatric solid tumors. Eighteen patients with pediatric solid tumors expressing GPC3 underwent GPC3-peptide vaccination (intradermal injections every 2 weeks), with the primary endpoint being the safety of GPC3-peptide vaccination and the secondary endpoints being immune response, as measured by interferon (IFN)-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay and Dextramer staining, and the clinical outcomes of tumor response, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Our findings indicated that GPC3 vaccination was well tolerated. We observed disease-control rates [complete response (CR)+partial response+stable disease] of 66.7% after 2 months, and although patients in the progression group unable to induce GPC3-peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) received poor prognoses, patients in the partial-remission and remission groups or those with hepatoblastoma received good prognoses. The GPC3-peptide vaccine induced a GPC3-specific CTL response in seven patients, with PFS and OS significantly longer in patients with high GPC3-specific CTL frequencies than in those with low frequencies. Furthermore, we established GPC3-peptide-specific CTL clones from a resected-recurrent tumor from one patient, with these cells exhibiting GPC3-peptide-specific cytokine secretion. The results of this trial demonstrated that the GPC3-peptide-specific CTLs induced by the GPC3-peptide vaccine infiltrated tumor tissue, and use of the GPC3-peptide vaccine might prevent the recurrence of pediatric solid tumors, especially hepatoblastomas, after a second CR.

Background: Pediatric patients with high-risk, relapsed, or refractory solid tumors have a poor prognosis. We have previously reported a dose-finding experience of high-dose chemotherapy consisting of thiotepa and melphalan ("double-conditioning regimen"). Using doses derived from that study, we have treated patients since 2005. We now report a retrospective review of patients treated by this fixed dose. Procedure:We reviewed 50 patients (median 4 years; range 0-15 years) with high-risk or relapsed/refractory solid tumors treated by this dose-fixed, double-conditioning regimen from April 2005 to May 2014. Doses were thiotepa 800 mg/m 2 and melphalan 280 mg/m 2 for children ≥2 years of age, and 32 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg, respectively, for children <2 years of age. Further, doses were reduced according to creatinine clearance with poor renal function. Results:Nonhematological toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal-grade 3 mucositis (n = 41) and grade 3-4 diarrhea (n = 10). Neurological, renal, and endothelial cell toxicity and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome were not observed. There were two toxic deaths (interstitial viral pneumonia). This regimen demonstrated antitumor activity against several types of tumors. Although the frequency of gastrointestinal toxicity was high, other severe toxicity was not observed. Conclusions:Our double-conditioning regimen was very well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity. We are moving forward with multi-institutional trials now. K E Y W O R D Smelphalan, pediatric solid tumor, stem cell transplantation, thiotepa

The prognosis of childhood cancers has improved markedly, and the proportion of long-term survivors has increased in recent years. However, with the increase in the number of long-term survivors, the development of latent treatment-related adverse effects, such as secondary malignancies, has generated new problems. Secondary cancer is defined as a histologically distinct malignancy that develops at least 2 months after the completion of treatment for primary cancer. Genetic factors and acquired conditions associated with treatment modalities are possible causes of secondary malignancy development. Genetic factors include the presence of Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) and retinoblastoma. In terms of acquired factors, radiation and chemotherapy have been reported to be the most strongly associated with secondary malignancy development. The use of alkylating agents and topoisomerase II inhibitors for the treatment of childhood cancer increases the subsequent risk of secondary tumors. We herein investigated three cases of secondary osteosarcoma several years after treatment for primary cancer. In the three patients, the familial history did not appear to fit the clinical diagnostic criteria of LFS or retinoblastoma. The patients had not received previous radiation therapy to the anatomical site of the secondary cancer. However, high dosages of alkylating agents and topoisomerase II inhibitors had been administered for the treatment of primary cancer. The exact link between chemotherapy and secondary cancer remains elusive, but the possibility of an association should be considered. Following the development of multidisciplinary therapies, long-term follow-up and monitoring of latent adverse effects may be necessary for childhood cancer survivors.

Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) reported to show a higher efficacy for adult Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) than other TKIs. However, few studies describe ponatinib for pediatric Ph+ALL; therefore, the efficacy, safety, and optimal dosage have not been determined. Here, we report a 3-year-old girl with Ph+ALL treated by a ponatinib-containing regimen with therapeutic drug monitoring in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In our case, a ponatinib-containing regimen was able to keep minimal residual disease negative, and the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of plasma ponatinib resembled that previously reported in adults. Penetration to the CSF was extremely limited. Thus, ponatinib was feasible and effective for a child with Ph+ALL, although the plasma concentration of ponatinib varied significantly throughout the treatment. The appropriate dosage should be confirmed in a prospective trial, including a detailed PK study.

Metastatic neuroblastoma is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Recent findings have shown that sorafenib decreases cell viability and increases apoptosis in human neuroblastoma cell lines. We report an experience of compassionate use of sorafenib in children with treatment‐refractory neuroblastoma. Sorafenib showed transient anti‐tumor activity in all four patients without adverse effects. However, progression was observed after a short stabilization phase. While sorafenib showed minimal anti‐tumor activity in our patients, it might still be effective in patients with neuroblastoma in an earlier stage.