To quantitatively examine the diurnal, or tidal, effects on dugong behavior, we employed passive acoustic observation techniques to monitor the animals. Automatic underwater sound monitoring systems for dugongs (AUSOMS-D) were deployed on the sea floor at depths of about 5 m south of Talibong Island, Thailand. The AUSOMS-D recorded underwater sound in stereo at a sampling frequency of 44.1 kHz for more than 116 consecutive hours. Dugong calls were automatically detected by newly developed software with a detection rate of 36.1% and a false alarm rate of 2.9%. In total, 3453 calls were detected during the 164 h of recording. The autocorrelation of the call rate indicated an attendance cycle of about 24 or 25 h, and the most frequent vocalizations were observed from 0300 to 0500 h. The calculated bearings of the sound sources, i.e., dugongs, were used as an indicator to track the relative numbers of dugongs during the monitoring periods.

Little is known about feeding behavior of wild dugongs (Dugong dugon) because direct measurements of feeding events in the water were scarcely feasible. In this study, the authors achieved the first successful feeding sound monitoring in a seagrass area using a full-band underwater recording system (called automatic underwater sound monitoring system for dugong: AUSOMS-D). In total, 175 feeding sounds were identified in 205 h of recording. Feeding sounds were only detected at night, implying diurnal differences in the feeding behavior of the studied dugong population. Differences in periodicity of feeding sounds suggested that two or more individuals were in the acoustically observable area. Furthermore, a feeding position monitored by two AUSOMS-Ds was used to calculate source levels of dugong feeding sounds. Assuming spherical_propagation, source levels were measured between 70.6 and 79.0 dB rms re 1 microPa/square root of Hz.

Patients with cancer are concerned about the effects of the COVID-19 vaccination. We conducted an online survey on the COVID-19 vaccination status and side effects among patients with cancer in Japan between August 8 and 14, 2021. We included 1182 female patients with cancer aged 20–70 years and registered on an online patient website. Of the patients, 944 had breast cancer, 216 had gynecological cancer, 798 were undergoing drug/radiation therapy, and 370 were in follow-up therapy. At the time of the survey, 885 patients had already received at least one dose. Of these, 580 had also received their second dose. The incidence rate of side effects was equivalent to previous reports. In patients with breast cancer, problems such as the onset or worsening of lymphedema or axillary lymphadenopathy metastasis requiring differential diagnosis were encountered following vaccination. A total of 768 patients were concerned about the vaccine at some point, and 726 consulted with their attending physicians about the timing or side effects of the vaccination. Of the 110 patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy, 75 adjusted the timing of the vaccination based on their therapy. The cross-analysis revealed that 81% of those who consulted their physician had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccination compared with 65% of those who had not consulted their physician. Consulting with a physician about the COVID-19 vaccination was found to alleviate the concerns of patients with cancer and encourage them to get vaccinated.

Background: COVID-19 vaccination-related lymphadenopathy is a frequent imaging finding which may be indistinguishable from malignant nodal involvement and lead to diagnostic difficulties in patients with cancer or healthy individuals on cancer screening. An expert panel of the leading cancer centers in United States recommended routine imaging examinations should be scheduled at least 6 weeks after the final vaccination to allow for any reactive lymphadenopathy to resolve. However, there were no prospective trials regarding COVID-19 vaccination-related lymphadenopathy and the evidence was so limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and imaging characteristics of COVID-19 vaccination-related axillary lymphadenopathy and assess the recovery period. Methods: We prospectively enrolled healthy women working at the St. Luke’s International Hospital who received Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination within 8 weeks before enrollment between May 10th and 27th, 2021. Women with a history of any type of cancer or axillary surgery, active atopic dermatitis and auto-immune disease were excluded. Participants underwent ultrasound examinations for bilateral axilla at the enrollment. Lymphadenopathy was defined as demonstrating an enlarged node(s) with more than 5mm in short axis by ultrasound imaging in this trial. As for imaging characteristics, status of cortical thickening, echogenic hilus and vascularity of lymph nodes were evaluated. Other side effects by vaccination were assessed by a questionnaire. If lymphadenopathy was detected, we followed the participant by ultrasound examination every three weeks until the lymphadenopathy was resolved. We evaluated the incidence rate and imaging characteristics of lymphadenopathy detected by ultrasound examination, and the recovery period required for improvement of the lymphadenopathy. We also validated the association of the lymphadenopathy with the participant characteristics and other side effects. Results: A total of 135 women were enrolled in this study. Participants' median age was 37 years (range 23-63). Median time from the latest vaccination to the enrollment was 45 days (range 8-56). In the ultrasound examination at enrollment, axillary lymphadenopathy was observed in 67 participants (50%) on the injected (ipsilateral) side. In the contralateral axilla, 13 participants (10%) showed lymphadenopathy. In the ipsilateral axilla, the number of enlarged node(s) was 1 node in 25 cases (19%), 2 nodes in 24 cases (18%), 3 nodes in 13 cases (10%), 4 nodes in 4 cases (3%) and 5 nodes in 1 case (1%). Regarding the ipsilateral enlarged lymph node, focal cortical thickening was observed in 58 cases (43%) and the absence of the echogenic hilus was observed in 15 cases (11%). Hypervascularity was observed in 15 cases (11%). Incidence of the lymphadenopathy was not statistically correlated with participant’s age or incidence of fever due to vaccination. At 6 weeks after the latest vaccination, the rate of ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathy was 48%, 40% at 8 weeks, and 6% at 12 weeks. In participants with lymphadenopathy, median recovery period to resolve the lymphadenopathy was 75 days from the latest vaccination. Conclusion: A half of participants showed COVID-19 vaccination-related axillary lymphadenopathy and the imaging characteristics were often indistinguishable from malignant nodal involvement. Therefore, patients with breast cancer should be vaccinated on the contralateral arm to the cancer side to avoid diagnostic conundrum. The lymphadenopathy was commonly observed even in 8 weeks, and mostly resolved after 12 weeks from the vaccination. Therefore, non-urgent imaging examinations such as screening would be recommended to be scheduled at least 12 weeks following the latest vaccination. Citation Format: Kumiko Kida, Hiroko Tsunoda, Risa Kasahara, Chika Tsutsumi, Akiko Numata, Yuri Takehara, Atsushi Yoshida, Junko Takei, Naoki Hayashi, Daiki Kobayashi, Hideko Yamauchi. Prospective ultrasonographic surveillance study for incidence and recovery period of COVID-19 vaccination-related axillary lymphadenopathy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-01-01.