Autologous breast reconstructions using deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps create a large incision, presenting an opportunity for surgical site complications. In this pilot study, we aimed to examine outcomes in DIEP donor site incisions managed with standard dressings (control; n = 5) or closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT; n = 5). We observed no significant differences between group age, body mass index, and past medical history. Both treatment groups had a similar duration of hospital stay, the number of blood transfusions, and pain scores on postoperative day 2 (P > .05). There was a trend of higher drainage (P = .251) and shorter time to incision healing (P = .067) in the ciNPT group than the control though the difference was not statistically significant. We did observe a significant improvement in scar pigmentation, vascularity, and pliability at 3, 6, and 12 months post‐surgery in the ciNPT group compared with control (P < .05). No surgical site complications were reported in the ciNPT group within the follow‐up period. In the control group, one patient developed wound edge fat necrosis requiring reoperation. In conclusion, we report that ciNPT is a useful incision management system for DIEP flap donor site incisions and it facilitated improved scar quality over standard dressings in this small pilot study. Further clinical studies are required to assess the full advantages provided by ciNPT.
Background
This study is a retrospective review to compare combining progressive tension sutures, closed drain, and fibrin sealant effects on seroma formation, postoperative drainage volume, and hospital stay for abdominoplasty after deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap. We ever published a 0% seroma rate in abdominoplasty after DIEP flap using progressive tension sutures and closed drain. Massive abdominal wound drainage caused delayed drain removal and increased hospital stay and medical costs.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated 54 abdominoplasty patients between December 2013 and September 2017; 43 patients used fibrin glue and 11 used progressive tension sutures and closed drain.
Results
Abdominal drainage for the first 3 postoperative days was 84.65 ± 52.95 mL in the fibrin group, with total drainage of 127.70 ± 125.50 mL and 214.45 ± 104.35 mL in the no fibrin group, with total drainage of 350.45 ± 213.58 mL. Drains were removed on postoperative day 6.21 ± 1.44 in the fibrin group and day 9.64 ± 1.96 in the no fibrin group. The association of the first 3 days and total drainage volumes with the drain removal day significantly differed in the fibrin and no fibrin groups. Hospital stay was 9.88 ± 3.55 and 12.45 ± 5.22 days in the fibrin and no fibrin group, respectively, with borderline significant differences.
Conclusions
Donor site abdominoplasty after DIEP flap combining progressive tension sutures, closed drainage, and fibrin glue can prevent seroma occurrence, reduce postoperative abdominal drainage and need for blood transfusion, and achieve early removal of the abdominal drain, shorter hospital stay, and lower medical cost.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
We report a rare case that after rapid recurrence there was pathological transition from a fibroadenoma and benign phyllodes tumor to borderline and malignant phyllodes tumor. Another rare finding included tumor dissemination in the pleural cavity via reconstructed deep inferior epigastric perforator flap edge and internal mammary vessel bundle. Hence, we eliminated the use of internal mammary vessel bundle as the recipient vessel for free-flap reconstruction to avoid recurrence in the pleural cavity. Remarkably, we achieved successful reconstruction of 2 huge defects (reconstruction of breast following mastectomy and that of chest wall following en bloc excision of recurrence) using 2 different free flaps.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.