No abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of breast volume is an essential component of preoperative planning in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) for achieving breast symmetry and a satisfactory cosmetic outcome. In this study, we compared breast volume estimation using three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine the accuracy of breast volume measurements. Further, a 3D printing mold for facilitating autologous breast reconstruction intraoperatively is described. Methods: Patients scheduled to therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy with one-stage IBR, either by autologous tissue transfer or direct implant, from 2016 to 2019, were enrolled in this study. 3D surface image and MRI were performed to evaluate breast volume and shape. The results were validated by the water displacement volume of the mastectomy specimen. Finally, a 3D printing mold was designed for breast reconstruction with autologous tissue. Results: Nineteen women who were scheduled to have 20 mastectomies (18 unilateral and one bilateral) were included. There was a strong linear association between breast volume measured using the two different methods and water displacement of mastectomy specimens when a Pearson correlation was used (3D surface image: r = 0.925, p < 0.001; MRI: r = 0.915, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated no proportional bias between the assessment methods. The coefficient of variation was 52.7% for 3D surface imaging and 59.9% for MRI. The volume of six breasts was evaluated by both measurements and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.689 for 3D surface image (p = 0.043) and 0.743 for MRI (p = 0.028). Conclusion: Using 3D surface image to evaluate breast shape and volume is a quick, effective, and convenient method. The accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability of 3D surface imaging were comparable with MRI in our study. In addition, 3D-printed molds can achieve better symmetry and aesthetic outcomes in immediate autologous breast reconstructions.

Background Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in women, and there is a demand in developing an Asian-based genetic profiling database for breast cancer in improving the treatment response. This study aimed to determine molecular alternations and identify potential therapeutic targets by analyzing the genetic profiling from a cohort of Taiwanese breast cancers using a commercialized next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeted panel. Methods The study population comprised a broad spectrum of breast cancer patients in Taiwan, including Group 1: planned to receive first-line surgery and followed by adjuvant therapy, or early relapse within three years, Group 2: planned to receive first-line neoadjuvant therapy and followed by surgery, and Group 3: de novo stage IV, or stage IV with recurrence beyond three years. Molecular profiles were determined using Thermo Fisher™ Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay version 3 (TMO comprehensive assay) from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tissues. Level of actionability was evaluated with the ESMO Scale of clinical actionability of molecular targets (ESCAT). Results A total of 380 TMO comprehensive assays were conducted on 372 patients, and we presented targeted sequencing analyses of Tier I: alteration-drug match associated with improved outcome in clinical trials including ERBB2 amplification, BRCA1/2 germline mutation, PIK3CA mutation, and NTRK translocation, and Tier II: antitumor activity associated with the matched alteration-drug but lack of prospective outcome data including PTEN loss, ESR1 mutation, AKT1 mutation, and ERBB2 mutation, and Tier III: matched drug-alteration that led to clinical benefit in another tumor type including MDM2 amplification, and ERBB3 mutation. Among them, 249 (66%) showed at least one actionable alternation based on the ESCAT criteria. The most frequent impacted genes (all variants combined within each sample) were PIK3CA (38%), followed by ERBB2 (23%), ESR1 (10%), AKT1 (6%), and BRCA2 (5%), and the remaining rare variants (less than 5% of assayed cohort) were BRCA1 (3%), MDM2 (2.2%), and ERBB3 (1.1%). Conclusion Targeted sequencing of actionable genes is believed to provide clinical applicability and substantial benefits for Taiwanese breast cancer patients. A valid scale of clinical actionability should be adopted for precision medicine practice under multidisciplinary molecular tumor board.

Background: To assess the clinical outcomes and metastatic behavior between de novo versus recurrent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on a single-institution database in Taiwan. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2017 with de novo stage IV or recurrent HER2-positive MBC. Several variables were recorded in patients with recurrent disease: age at diagnosis, metastatic site, hormone receptor (HR) status, HER2 status, and disease-free interval (DFI). Treatments and metastatic patterns were compared between de novo stage IV and recurrent MBC cohorts. Post-metastasis survival (PMS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox regression analysis. Results: In total, 1360 patients were diagnosed with breast cancer with HER2 overexpression. At baseline, de novo stage IV patients were older than recurrent MBC patients (median age 58 vs 53). The majority of the de novo stage IV patients were diagnosed after 2010, while most of the recurrent MBC patients were diagnosed during 2000-2009. An increased number of de novo stage IV patients underwent targeted therapy than recurrent MBC patients was also noted. PMS in patients with de novo stage IV and recurrent MBC was 79.2 months and 61.8 months, respectively, which indicated significant better survival in de novo stage IV than those with recurrent MBC disease. Longer survival was also noted in de novo stage IV and recurrent MBC with DFI >24 months than in those with recurrent MBC with DFI <24 months and in patients receiving HER2-targeted therapy after MBC diagnosis than in those not receiving the therapy. However, median PMS showed no significant difference between patients with the luminal B2 (HR-positive, HER2-negative) and HER2-enriched (HR-negative, HER2-positive) subtypes. After adjustment in multivariate analysis, a low risk of BC-specific death was observed in patients aged >50 years, those receiving HER2-targeted therapy for MBC, and those with oligometastasis, while patients with first metastases to the liver or brain showed a higher risk of BC-specific death than those without metastases. Conclusion: De novo and recurrent MBC have distinct characteristic, metastatic patterns and outcomes in Asian HER2-positive breast cancer patients. The age distribution and survivals between HR+/– status were different to non-Asian group. These differences should be further investigated in the future considering ethnic factor.