No abstract

No abstract

Background-Several echocardiographic dyssynchrony indexes have been proposed to identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy using tissue velocity and strain. The present study aimed to compare tissue velocity-derived and strain-derived dyssynchrony indexes in patients with or without systolic dysfunction and left bundle-branch block. Methods and Results-Tissue Doppler imaging was performed in 120 subjects divided into 4 groups: group 1 (nϭ40), normal subjects; group 2 (nϭ20), normal left ventricular ejection fraction and left bundle-branch block; group 3 (nϭ20), left ventricular ejection fraction Ͻ35% and normal conduction; and group 4 (nϭ40), left ventricular ejection fraction Ͻ35% and left bundle-branch block. Dyssynchrony indexes based on time to peak tissue velocity (septal-lateral delay, anteroseptal-posterior delay, and SD in time to peak systolic velocity in the 12 left ventricular segments) and strain (SD of time to peak strain in 12 segments) were measured. The SD in time to peak systolic velocity in the 12 left ventricular segments was greater in group 4 (54 ms; 25th and 75th percentiles, 46 to 64 ms) than group 1 (44 ms; 25th and 75th percentiles, 28 to 53 ms; Pϭ0.006), but there was a considerable overlap of all tissue velocity-derived indexes among 4 groups, with 40% to 68% of group 1 having values proposed for predicting the responders of cardiac resynchronization therapy. The SD of time to peak strain in 12 segments distinguished these groups with much less overlap (PϽ0.01 for all pairwise comparisons). Conclusions-A substantial proportion of normal subjects have tissue velocity-derived dyssynchrony indexes higher than the cutoff value proposed for predicting beneficial effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Strain-derived timing index appears to be more specific for dyssynchrony in patients with systolic dysfunction and left bundle-branch block.Identifying an optimal tissue velocity-or strain-derived dyssynchrony index requires a large prospective clinical trial.

No abstract

Background The prognostic value of Doppler myocardial imaging, including myocardial velocity imaging, strain, and strain rate imaging, in patients with primary (AL) amyloidosis is uncertain. The aim of this longitudinal study was to identify independent predictors of survival, comparing clinical data, hematologic and cardiac biomarkers, and standard echocardiographic and Doppler myocardial imaging measures in a cohort of patients with AL amyloidosis. Methods A total of 249 consecutive patients with AL amyloidosis were prospectively enrolled. The primary end point was all-cause mortality, and during a median follow-up period of 18 months, 75 patients (30%) died. Clinical and electrocardiographic data, biomarkers (brain natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin T) and standard echocardiographic and longitudinal systolic and diastolic Doppler myocardial imaging measurements for 16 left ventricular segments were tested as potential independent predictors of survival. Results Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; P = .03), New York Heart Association class III or IV (HR, 2.47; P = .01), the presence of pleural effusion (HR, 1.79; P = .08), brain natriuretic peptide level (HR, 1.29; P = .01), ejection time (HR, 0.99; P = .13), and peak longitudinal systolic strain of the basal anteroseptal segment (HR, 1.05; P = .02) were independent predictors in the final model. Conclusions Multivariate survival analysis identified independent predictors of clinical outcome in patients with AL amyloidosis: New York Heart Association class III or IV, presence of pleural effusion, brain natriuretic peptide level > 493 pg/mL, ejection time < 273 ms, and peak longitudinal systolic basal anteroseptal strain less negative than or equal to −7.5% defined a high-risk group of patients.