BackgroundAdjuvant tumor cell vaccine with chemotherapy against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) shows limited clinical response. Whether it provokes effective cellular immunity in tumor microenvironment is questionable. Concomitant active tuberculosis in NSCLC (TBLC) resembles locoregional immunotherapy of tumor cell vaccine; thus, maximally enriches effective anti-tumor immunity. This study compares the survival and immunological cell profile in TBLC over NSCLC alone.MethodsRetrospective review of NSCLC patients within 1-year-period of 2007 and follow-up till 2010.ResultsA total 276 NSCLC patients were included. The median survival of TBLC is longer than those of NSCLC alone (11.6 vs. 8.8 month, p<0.01). Active tuberculosis is an independent predictor of better survival with HR of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.48∼0.97). Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (55.8 vs. 31.7%, p<0.01) is a significant risk factor for NSCLC with active TB. The median survival of SCC with active tuberculosis is significantly longer than adenocarcinoma or undetermined NSCLC with TB (14.2 vs. 6.6 and 2.8 months, p<0.05). Active tuberculosis in SCC increases the expression of CD3 (46.4±24.8 vs. 24.0±16.0, p<0.05), CXCR3 (35.1±16.4 vs. 19.2±13.3, p<0.01) and IP-10 (63.5±21.9 vs. 35.5±21.0, p<0.01), while expression of FOXP3 is decreased (3.5±0.5 vs. 13.3±3.7 p<0.05, p<0.05). Survival of SCC with high expression of CD3 (12.1 vs. 3.6 month, p<0.05) and CXCR3 (12.1 vs. 4.4 month, p<0.05) is longer than that with low expression.ConclusionsActive tuberculosis in NSCLC shows better survival outcome. The effective T lymphocyte infiltration in tumor possibly underlies the mechanism. Locoregional immunotherapy of tumor cell vaccine may deserve further researches.

Patients with severe asthma have elevated numbers of circulating fibrocytes that show enhanced myofibroblastic differentiation and that are less responsive to the effects of corticosteroids.

The incidence of LS associated with NPC and after RT was higher in patients who underwent bilateral neck-lymphatic boosting by electron beams than for those who underwent unilateral boosting or who did not undergo boosting. A correlation between increased incidence of LS and RT dose on the cervical spinal cord was noted when the cord dose exceeded 48.9 Gy. Therefore, wherever possible, a CT simulator and a three-dimensional treatment-planning system should necessarily be used to verify the dose distribution of electron-beam RT to diminish the chance of radiation overdose on the cervical cord.