The new approach to manage ipsilateral femoral neck-shaft fractures by using reconstruction nails obtains relatively good clinical results.

Background Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most important perioperative complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although risk-stratification tools exist for the prediction of cardiac complications including AMI after noncardiac surgery, such stratification does not differentiate the patients with a coronary stent alone, AMI without a stent, or AMI with a stent. The risk of postoperative AMI in these patient groups may vary. Several studies have recommended suitable times for noncardiac surgery in patients with a coronary stent; however, they do not differentiate between the patients with AMI and no AMI. The suitable time of noncardiac surgery for patients with AMI and stent may vary from those with a stent alone. Moreover, a study to evaluate the risk of AMI within 1 year in an Asian population with a history of AMI or coronary stent who underwent TKA has not been reported. Questions/purposes (1) What are the risks of AMI within 1 year of TKA in patients who have had a stent alone, AMI without a stent, or AMI with a stent as compared with patients without an AMI/stent? (2) For patients with AMI/ stent placement, when can TKA be performed where the risk of subsequent AMI normalizes? (3) What comorbidities are associated with post-TKA AMI? (4) Is the risk of AMI within 1 year after surgery in patients undergoing TKA without a history of AMI/stent higher than that in patients with no surgery? Methods This study is a retrospective study of the medical claim records of 128,216 patients who underwent TKA between 1997 and 2010 in Taiwan. The records were retrieved from the research database of the Bureau of National Health Insurance in Taiwan, which maintains the records of 99.68% of the Taiwan population. The patients who had a history of AMI or coronary stent placement within the year before TKA were compared with the patients who had not experienced AMI or stent placement before TKA. The control subjects were matched according to sex, age, Charlson score, and year of surgery. There were 2413 patients in each group. The patients with a history of AMI or stent placement and the timing of TKA after coronary event were further stratified as with a coronary stent alone, AMI without a stent, and AMI with a Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. Conclusions This study found the risk of post-TKA AMI remains high within 1 year in patients with a history of AMI/stent. It is recommended that an elective TKA should be performed at least 1 year after an episode of AMI or stent placement. Stents do not provide protection against post-TKA AMI within 6 months of the AMI and patients with AMI + stent have a higher risk of AMI than those with only AMI. Patients of AMI/stent on hemodialysis have a very high risk of post-TKA AMI. However, the risk of AM...

The poor functionality, high cost, complexity of the electronic health record (EHR) and the poor integration of the traditional Hospital Information System (HIS) have been a challenging task for an efficient clinical workflow Methods and Participants. The study was conducted from the perspective on the hospital`s staffs, which including doctors, nurses and clinical information technology (CIT) engineers, and patients' caregivers (usually the family member of the patient or the special caregiver hired by the patient) upon patients receiving joint replacement. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed. Comparison of the functions, features and the overall satisfaction score of questionnaire on the proposed mobile medical information system (MMIS) and Traditional HIS/EHR showed that MMIS is more superior than traditional HIS/EHR. With the limited function of the traditional HIS/EHR, MMIS may be helpful for acquiring the second opinion from different specialists to the primary care providers in particular for time demanding or life threatening diseases. Further study within a larger sample size is needed to determine the extent of the benefits of the system on other type of surgical patients'.

No abstract