Chronic small bowel pseudo-obstruction is rare, and the disease process is poorly understood. Its clinical picture and radiographic findings can resemble mechanical small bowel obstruction and may lead to unnecessary surgery. We report a case of a 68-year-old man who presented acutely with severe abdominal distension and pain after a recent laparoscopic adhesiolysis. His abdominal CT scan revealed grossly distended small bowel with pneumatosis intestinalis and free intraperitoneal air, which led to an exploratory laparotomy. He had a history of having undergone numerous radiological and endoscopic investigations and multiple laparotomies/laparoscopic procedures but without a definitive diagnosis. Subsequent episodes of small bowel pseudo-obstruction occurred, and he developed intestinal failure. His care required the input of multiple healthcare professionals. He was ultimately referred to the National Intestinal Failure Unit for further assessment and management.

Ischaemic colitis typically presents with an acute abdominal pain and distension with bloody diarrhoea. However, this can vary and the condition is frequently missed or misdiagnosed, especially if the patient presents with chronic symptoms. Herein, we report a case of chronic presentation of ischaemic colitis in a 48-year-old man with a history of myocardial infarction. This report highlights the importance of having ischaemic colitis as a differential diagnosis whenever a patient with a history of arteriosclerosis presents with atypical chronic abdominal pain.

Background Patients suspected to have upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer can be referred directly for investigation; however, at times this may result to inappropriate referrals. This study explores the model of a “one-stop” clinic as an alternative to the direct referral system. The current study aims to assess the feasibility and outcomes of a one-stop UGI clinic and evaluate sensitivity and specificity of “on-the-day” diagnoses. Methods A retrospective analysis of case notes of patients seen in one-stop clinic, between January 2017 and January 2019, was conducted. All General Practitioner (GP) referrals were screened by a specialist nurse. Results After completion of the post-GP referral screening process, 252 patients (median age 68 years, IQR 58.8–77.3 years; M:F ratio 118:134) were allocated to the one-stop clinic. OGD was not required, contra-indicated or declined in 27 cases (10.7%). The records of three patients could not be found. One patient did not attend. Overall, 221 patients underwent testing and received “on-the-day” diagnoses. Sensitivity was 94% (range 87–100%), and specificity was 92% (88–96%). Ninety-six percent of patients received a diagnosis on the day. Conclusions The one-stop clinic was feasible and had good specificity and sensitivity. The finding of 10.7% of cases not being suitable for OGD indicates that a patient/specialist consultation is necessary to prevent misuse of endoscopy appointments. The authors recommend widespread adoption of one-stop clinics in UGI surgery.

Aim Methods Result Conclusions