Background Health care workers at the frontline are facing a substantial risk of infection during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Methods We acquired information and data on the general information, infection and death status of health care workers in Wuhan during the COVID-19 outbreak and completed statistical analyses. Results We have obtained the data on 2,457 infected cases among health care workers in Wuhan, China. More than half of the infected individuals were nurses (52.06%), while 33.62% of infected cases were doctors and 14.33% of cases were medical staff. In particular, the case infection rate of nurses (2.22%) was remarkably higher than that of doctors (1.92%). Most infected cases among health care workers were female (72.28%). A majority of the infected health care workers (89.26%) came from general hospitals, followed by specialized hospitals (5.70%) and community hospitals (5.05%). The case infection rate of health care workers (2.10%) was dramatically higher than that of non-health care workers (0.43%). The case fatality rate of health care workers (0.69%) was significantly lower than that of non-health care workers (5.30%). Conclusions The infection risk of HCWs is clearly higher than that of non-HCWs. HCWs play an essential role in fighting the pandemic. The analysis of the infection status of HCWs is essential to attract enough attention from the public, provide effective suggestions for government agencies and improve protective measures for HCWs.

BackgroundDynamic changes in circulating immune-inflammatory cells have been regarded as simple and convenient prognostic biomarkers in various cancers. However, studies on the prognostic values of their ratios in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remain limited.Materials and MethodsA total of 493 OSCC patients were included in the present study. Here, we investigated the prognostic values of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil-to-white blood cell ratio (NWR), and lymphocyte-to-white blood cell ratio (LWR) in OSCC. The correlations of the NLR, LMR, NWR, and LWR with clinicopathological characteristics were statistically analyzed using the Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier curves, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models.ResultKaplan-Meier analyses revealed that OSCC patients with a high LMR and low NWR had prolonged overall survival (OS, P<0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS, P<0.001 and P=0.003, respectively), but there were no significant differences in metastasis-free survival (MFS, P=0.053 and P=0.052, respectively). In contrary, a high NLR and low LWR were associated with poor OS (P<0.001 and P=0.0016, respectively), DFS (P=0.0014 and 0.0012, respectively) and MFS (P=0.021 and 0.008, respectively). Additionally, Cox multivariate analyses showed that the LMR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (P=0.007) and DFS (P=0.017), while the LWR was an independent prognostic factor for MFS (P=0.009).ConclusionPreoperative NLR, LMR, NWR, and LWR in the peripheral blood are significant prognostic factors for OSCC and might be helpful in predicting OSCC progression.

No abstract

Objective Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), a common oral mucosal disorder characterized by chronic, inflammatory, and ovoid ulcers, has a complex etiology. The purpose of the study was to investigate the specific dietary factors influencing the prevalence of RAS. Methods A total of 754 participants aged 18 to 59 years were enrolled in this descriptive cross-sectional study. An anonymous questionnaire was adopted to investigate the distribution of RAS, dietary factors, self-reported trigger factors, and therapeutic methods. Results Among all participants, the prevalence rate of RAS was 21.4%. Univariable analysis showed that fruit, dairy products, vegetables, and water, but not fried foods, fermented foods, spicy foods, and eggs, were preventive factors against RAS. After adjusting for age and sex, multivariable regression analysis suggested that fruit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.430, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.218–0.847) and water (aOR = 0.294, 95% CI = 0.119–0.726) were protective factors against RAS. Conclusion This study found that the consumption of fruit and water was negatively associated with RAS. These results imply a potential adjunctive and complementary role of food in RAS treatment and some feasible means of RAS prevention.

BackgroundInappropriate use of antibiotics has become a major driver for the spread of antimicrobial resistance globally, particularly common in China. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are effective in optimizing antimicrobial use and decreasing the emergence of multi-drug-resistant organisms, and the pharmacist has performed a leading role in this program.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs driven by pharmacists on antibiotic consumption and costs and the appropriateness of antibiotic use.MethodsA single-center retrospective quasi-experimental design was conducted in two independent hepatobiliary surgery wards and two independent respiratory wards in a county-level tertiary general hospital in Jiangsu, China. Each intervention group was served with antimicrobial stewardship programs with prescriptions audit and feedback, antibiotics restriction, education, and training. The propensity score matching method was employed to balance confounding variables between the intervention group and control group, and a difference-in-differences analysis was used to evaluate the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs. The primary outcome was measured by scores of rationality evaluation of antibiotics.ResultsThe DID results demonstrated that the implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship programs was associated with a reduction in the average length of hospital stay (coefficient = −3.234, p = 0.006), DDDs per patient (coefficient = −2.352, p = 0.047), and hospitalization costs (coefficient = −7745.818, p = 0.005) in the hepatobiliary surgery ward, while it was associated with a decrease in DDDs per patient (coefficient = −3.948, p = 0.029), defined daily doses per patient day (coefficient = −0.215, p = 0.048), and antibiotic costs (coefficient = −935.087, p = 0.014) in the respiratory ward. The program was also associated with a decrease in rationality evaluation scores (p < 0.001) in two wards.ConclusionThe result reveals that the implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship programs is effective in reducing the length of hospital stay, decreasing antibiotics consumption and costs, and improving the appropriateness of antimicrobial use such as decreasing irrational use of cephalosporins, reducing combinations, and improving timely conversion. However, great attention ought to be paid to the improper use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The government is responsible for providing sustainable formal education for pharmacists, and more funding and staff support to promote antimicrobial stewardship programs.