Homogeneous sheared stratified turbulence was simulated using a DNS code. The initial turbulent Reynolds numbers (Re) were 22, 44, and 89, and the initial dimensionless shear rate (S*) varied from 2 to 16. We found (similarly to Rogers (1986) for unstratified flows) the final value of S* at high Re to be ∼ 11, independent of initial S*. The final S* varies at low Re, in agreement with Jacobitz et al. (1997). At low Re, the stationary Richardson number (Ris) depends on both Re and S*, but at higher Re, it varies only with Re. A scaling based on the turbulent kinetic energy equation which suggests this result employs instantaneous rather than initial values of flow parameters.At high Re the dissipation increases with applied shear, allowing a constant final S*. The increased dissipation occurs primarily at high wavenumbers due to the stretching of eddies by stronger shear. For the high-Re stationary flows, the turbulent Froude number (Frt) is a constant independent of S*. An Frt-based scaling predicts the final value of S* well over a range of Re. Therefore Frt is a more appropriate parameter for describing the state of developed stratified turbulence than the gradient Richardson number.

Abstract:To test the ability of acoustic Doppler current profilers ͑ADCPs͒ to measure turbulence, profiles measured with two pulse-topulse coherent ADCPs in a laboratory flume were compared to profiles measured with an acoustic Doppler velocimeter, and time series measured in the acoustic beam of the ADCPs were examined. A four-beam ADCP was used at a downstream station, while a three-beam ADCP was used at a downstream station and an upstream station. At the downstream station, where the turbulence intensity was low, both ADCPs reproduced the mean velocity profile well away from the flume boundaries; errors near the boundaries were due to transducer ringing, flow disturbance, and sidelobe interference. At the upstream station, where the turbulence intensity was higher, errors in the mean velocity were large. The four-beam ADCP measured the Reynolds stress profile accurately away from the bottom boundary, and these measurements can be used to estimate shear velocity. Estimates of Reynolds stress with a three-beam ADCP and turbulent kinetic energy with both ADCPs cannot be computed without further assumptions, and they are affected by flow inhomogeneity. Neither ADCP measured integral time scales to within 60%.

No abstract

No abstract